On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:55:10PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2015-12-11 13:08 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang :
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:25:17AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >> Chips from the at24cs EEPROM series have an additional read-only memory
> >> area
> >>
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 02:19:15 PM Loc Ho wrote:
> Add APM X-Gene ACPI I2C device support. These patches follow
> the same implementation as AMD I2C driver - changes in ACPI APD
> and Designware I2C drivers.
>
> v2:
> * Spilt the acpi_apd change with defines for AMD and X-Gene I2C's
>
>
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> > "at" is not a valid vendor prefix, correcting the same to "atmel"
> >
>
> I'm afraid you can't just do this change alone as it's used in some
> DTS.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 05:02:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> > This adds devicetree documentation for the bindings of rtc-rx8010
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akshay Bhat
> > ---
>
Am 10.08.2015 um 13:12 schrieb Michal Marek:
> On 2015-08-10 11:14, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 10.08.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Lee Jones:
>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>
Hi!
-next faces some build issues on UML because of unmet direct dependencies.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:35:12AM +, Sifan Naeem wrote:
> The following patches are required to enchance the existing driver to
> support i2c on pistachio.
>
> This patch series depends on the series of fixes posted earlier[1].
> The features added in this series were tested with the earlier
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:56:31PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> If we are in a multi-master scenario, we need to block runtime PM so the
> arbitration circuit stays awake.
>
> So, we define a new binding and adapt the i2c-rcar driver to have an example
> implementation.
Applied to for-next,