Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/9] eeprom: at24: at24cs series serial number read

2016-01-02 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:55:10PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2015-12-11 13:08 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang : > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:25:17AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >> Chips from the at24cs EEPROM series have an additional read-only memory > >> area > >>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] i2c:dw: Add APM X-Gene ACPI I2C device support

2016-01-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 02:19:15 PM Loc Ho wrote: > Add APM X-Gene ACPI I2C device support. These patches follow > the same implementation as AMD I2C driver - changes in ACPI APD > and Designware I2C drivers. > > v2: > * Spilt the acpi_apd change with defines for AMD and X-Gene I2C's > >

Re: [PATCH] DT: i2c: Update vendor prefix for 24c00

2016-01-02 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote: > > "at" is not a valid vendor prefix, correcting the same to "atmel" > > > > I'm afraid you can't just do this change alone as it's used in some > DTS.

Re: [PATCH] DT: i2c: Add Epson RX8010 to list of trivial devices

2016-01-02 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 05:02:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote: > > This adds devicetree documentation for the bindings of rtc-rx8010 > > driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Akshay Bhat > > --- >

Re: unmet direct dependencies in -next

2016-01-02 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 10.08.2015 um 13:12 schrieb Michal Marek: > On 2015-08-10 11:14, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 10.08.2015 um 11:10 schrieb Lee Jones: >>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Hi! -next faces some build issues on UML because of unmet direct dependencies.

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] i2c: img-scb: enchancements to support i2c on pistachio

2016-01-02 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:35:12AM +, Sifan Naeem wrote: > The following patches are required to enchance the existing driver to > support i2c on pistachio. > > This patch series depends on the series of fixes posted earlier[1]. > The features added in this series were tested with the earlier

Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: rcar: adapt PM usage to multi master case

2016-01-02 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:56:31PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > If we are in a multi-master scenario, we need to block runtime PM so the > arbitration circuit stays awake. > > So, we define a new binding and adapt the i2c-rcar driver to have an example > implementation. Applied to for-next,