Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > From: Hezi > > Commit 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix > several problems") completely reworked the offload support, but > stupidly left a debugging-related "return false" at the

Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

> Wolfram, do you want me to send a v2 with Hezi's full name or will you > fix that up when applying the patch ? I'll fix. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

From: Hezi Commit 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix several problems") completely reworked the offload support, but stupidly left a debugging-related "return false" at the beginning of the mv64xxx_i2c_can_offload() function. This has the unfortunate

Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

Hello, On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:56:21 +, Hezi Shahmoon wrote: > Hi. > > It is: > Hezi Shahmoon > > Email: > h...@marvell.com Thanks Hezi. Wolfram, do you want me to send a v2 with Hezi's full name or will you fix that up when applying the patch ? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO,

Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > From: Hezi Is "Hezi" the full name? > > Commit 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix > several problems") completely reworked the offload support, but > stupidly left a debugging-related

RE: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

; Lior Amsalem; Jason Cooper; Andrew Lunn; Sebastian Hesselbarth; Gregory Clement; Marcin Wojtas; Hezi Shahmoon; sta...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > From: Hezi <h...@marve