Ben Dooks said the following:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> Ben Dooks said the following:
>> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > This fixes MAL (arbit
>
> Ben Dooks said the following:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> >> wrote:
> >> > This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
> >> > RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generate
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > Ben Dooks said the following:
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Ben Dooks said the following:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> >> wrote:
> >> > This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal us
Ben Dooks said the following:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
>> wrote:
>> > This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
>> > RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last b
Ben Dooks wrote:
is there a new version of this patch available?
I will catch up on it ASAP.
/Esben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.ht
is there a new version of this patch available?
--
Ben (b...@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Esben and Ben,
>
> Sorry for the lateness in reviewing this. FWIW, here are my comments.
>
> g.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Esben Haabendal
> wrote:
>> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
>> RSTA (repea
Hi Esben and Ben,
Sorry for the lateness in reviewing this. FWIW, here are my comments.
g.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Esben Haabendal
wrote:
> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
> RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
> of reads
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:15:22PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> >>> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
"Esben" == Esben Haabendal writes:
Hi,
Esben> It's strange, that line looks perfectly fine when I check the
Esben> mail in my GMail inbox and the outbox from the account I sent
Esben> it from.
Well, it is here and in the archive:
http://ozlabs.org/piper
> "Esben" == Esben Haabendal writes:
Hi,
Esben> It's strange, that line looks perfectly fine when I check the
Esben> mail in my GMail inbox and the outbox from the account I sent
Esben> it from.
Well, it is here and in the archive:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-May/072274
> Esben> I've checked both my copy in my "Sent" folder and the copy
> Esben> received from the list, and I cannot see any "line break"
> Esben> breakage of the patch.
>
> I guess Wolfram referred to the context line which was clearly word wrapped:
>
> @@ -456,17 +456,22 @@ static int mpc_xfer(st
> "Esben" == Esben Haabendal writes:
Hi,
>> I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check
>> @@-line). Also, I don't really have the time to dig into the topic, so I
>> would only test it and give a tested-by-tag if it doesn't break anything
>> here. I think Joakim
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
>>> RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated afte
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > Any blockers to get this accepted?
>>
>> It would be nice to get an ack from someone who can actually test
>> the driver before getting this merged.
>
> I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check
> @@-line). Also,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Esben Haabendal
wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> wrote:
>> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
>> RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
>> of reads. With this patch, it is possib
Wolfram Sang wrote on 28/05/2009 19:17:26:
>
> > > Any blockers to get this accepted?
> >
> > It would be nice to get an ack from someone who can actually test
> > the driver before getting this merged.
>
> I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check
> @@-line). Also, I do
> > Any blockers to get this accepted?
>
> It would be nice to get an ack from someone who can actually test
> the driver before getting this merged.
I wanted to test it, but it does not apply due to line breaks (check
@@-line). Also, I don't really have the time to dig into the topic, so I
would
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
> wrote:
> > This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
> > RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
> > of reads. With this patch, i
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Esben Haabendal
wrote:
> This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
> RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
> of reads. With this patch, it is possible to do an i2c_transfer() with
> additional i2c_msg's following
This fixes MAL (arbitration lost) bug caused by illegal use of
RSTA (repeated START) after STOP condition generated after last byte
of reads. With this patch, it is possible to do an i2c_transfer() with
additional i2c_msg's following the I2C_M_RD messages.
It still needs to be resolved if it is p
22 matches
Mail list logo
