Re: [PATCH 0/1] ST DDC I2C U300 bus driver v2

2009-05-08 Thread Linus Walleij
2009/5/6 Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com: Updated patch for this driver, please tell me if it's good enough enough for mainlining now... No reply means yes I assume :-) Do I send this directly to Jean for integration? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 0/1] ST DDC I2C U300 bus driver v2

2009-05-08 Thread Jean Delvare
On Fri, 8 May 2009 10:17:58 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: 2009/5/6 Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com: Updated patch for this driver, please tell me if it's good enough enough for mainlining now... No reply means yes I assume :-) Wrong assumption. No reply means we are busy. In

Re: [PATCH 0/1] ST DDC I2C U300 bus driver v2

2009-05-08 Thread Linus Walleij
2009/5/8 Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org: No reply means yes I assume :-) Wrong assumption. No reply means we are busy. In other words: be patient. Aw sorry man. I still need to learn patience, I know. Doesn't the platform this driver is aimed at qualify as embedded? I doubt this driver

Re: [PATCH] ST DDC I2C bus driver v1

2009-05-08 Thread Jamie Lokier
Jean Delvare wrote: By setting bit 7 resp bit 4 of I2C_CR it will be switched from plain I2C to DDC1 or DDC2 respectively. I didn't add code for it since it cannot be tested on this reference hardware, but if you like I can try to add that in anyway. Would be a module parameter to