Re: [PATCH 21/66] rtl2830: implement own I2C locking

On 02/02/2015 10:56 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Mauro, Antti, On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:07:26 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:49:14 +0200 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu: Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons: 1) Chips uses multiple register pages

Re: [PATCH 21/66] rtl2830: implement own I2C locking

On 02/02/2015 10:07 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:49:14 +0200 Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu: Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons: 1) Chips uses multiple register pages/banks on single I2C slave. Page is changed via I2C register access. 2) Chip

Re: [PATCH 21/66] rtl2830: implement own I2C locking

On 02/03/2015 07:53 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:33:24 +0100 Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de escreveu: Ok, this may eventually work ok for now, but a further change at the I2C core could easily break it. So, we need to double check about such patch with the I2C

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] i2c mux cleanup and locking update

On 01/05/2016 05:57 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: From: Peter Rosin Hi! I have a pair of boards with this i2c topology: GPIO ---| -- BAT1 | v / I2C -+--B---+ MUX | \