So I am not surprised that this only shows up now.
I am, to be honest. It shows running lm-sensors with ACPI on a kernel
newer than 18 months. Not a rare scenario, so I thought.
And thanks to Mark's recent post I understand now that this is only
relevant for ACPI5 enumerated devices. I
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:18:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 08/25/2015 07:57 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:25:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI
On 08/25/2015 09:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:18:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 08/25/2015 07:57 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:25:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit
On 08/25/2015 08:03 AM, Dustin Byford wrote:
On Mon Aug 24 13:52, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
I don't know how common ACPI enumerated I2C hwmon devices are but I guess
they exists since Dustin notices this issue and wrote With that change,
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0-004a, for example, became
In this particular case it looks like we need a mechanism to use the old
naming scheme for hwmon and the new one for everything else or something
similar. I'm afraid I am not familiar enough with the i2c core to suggest
anything specific ATM, though.
Well, it boils down to directory names
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:25:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors which relies on I2C hwmon slave devices under
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/
On 08/25/2015 07:57 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:25:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors which relies on I2C hwmon
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:25:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors which relies on I2C hwmon slave devices under
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/ to be named as x-00yz. However if those hwmon
devices are ACPI 5
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors which relies on I2C hwmon slave devices under
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/ to be named as x-00yz. However if those hwmon
devices are ACPI 5 enumerated their name became i2c-INTABCD:ij and sysfs
code in
On Monday, August 24, 2015 03:26:13 PM Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors which relies on I2C hwmon slave devices under
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/ to
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:52:02PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Commit 70762abb9f89 (i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C
slaves) broke the lm-sensors which relies on I2C hwmon slave devices under
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/ to be named as x-00yz. However if those hwmon
devices are ACPI 5
12 matches
Mail list logo
