Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

[Wolfram Sang]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> From: Hezi 
> 
> Commit 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix
> several problems") completely reworked the offload support, but
> stupidly left a debugging-related "return false" at the beginning of
> the mv64xxx_i2c_can_offload() function. This has the unfortunate
> consequence that offloading is in fact never used, which wasn't really
> the intention.
> 
> This commit fixes that problem by removing the stupid "return false".
> 
> Fixes: 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix several 
> problems")
> Cc: 
> Signed-off-by: Hezi 
> [Thomas: reworked commit log and title.]
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni 

Applied to for-current, thanks!



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

[Wolfram Sang]

> Wolfram, do you want me to send a v2 with Hezi's full name or will you
> fix that up when applying the patch ?

I'll fix.



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:56:21 +, Hezi Shahmoon wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> It is:
> Hezi Shahmoon
> 
> Email:
> h...@marvell.com

Thanks Hezi.

Wolfram, do you want me to send a v2 with Hezi's full name or will you
fix that up when applying the patch ?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

[Wolfram Sang]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> From: Hezi 

Is "Hezi" the full name?

> 
> Commit 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix
> several problems") completely reworked the offload support, but
> stupidly left a debugging-related "return false" at the beginning of
> the mv64xxx_i2c_can_offload() function. This has the unfortunate
> consequence that offloading is in fact never used, which wasn't really
> the intention.
> 
> This commit fixes that problem by removing the stupid "return false".
> 
> Fixes: 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix several 
> problems")
> Cc: 
> Signed-off-by: Hezi 
> [Thomas: reworked commit log and title.]
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni 
> ---
> Note: the original fix is from Hezi, but I rewrote the commit log,
> which is why I authorized myself to treat my own work as being
> "stupid". Which it really was.

:)

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> index 30059c1..5801227 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> @@ -669,8 +669,6 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_can_offload(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
>   struct i2c_msg *msgs = drv_data->msgs;
>   int num = drv_data->num_msgs;
>  
> - return false;
> -
>   if (!drv_data->offload_enabled)
>   return false;
>  
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

RE: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

[Hezi Shahmoon]

Hi.

It is:
Hezi Shahmoon

Email:
h...@marvell.com

I will fix this for future commits.

Thanks,
Hezi.

-Original Message-
From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w...@the-dreams.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:22 PM
To: Thomas Petazzoni
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; Tawfik Bayouk; Nadav Haklai; Lior Amsalem; Jason 
Cooper; Andrew Lunn; Sebastian Hesselbarth; Gregory Clement; Marcin Wojtas; 
Hezi Shahmoon; sta...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: really allow I2C offloading

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> From: Hezi <h...@marvell.com>

Is "Hezi" the full name?

> 
> Commit 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix 
> several problems") completely reworked the offload support, but 
> stupidly left a debugging-related "return false" at the beginning of 
> the mv64xxx_i2c_can_offload() function. This has the unfortunate 
> consequence that offloading is in fact never used, which wasn't really 
> the intention.
> 
> This commit fixes that problem by removing the stupid "return false".
> 
> Fixes: 00d8689b85a7 ("i2c: mv64xxx: rework offload support to fix 
> several problems")
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hezi <h...@marvell.com>
> [Thomas: reworked commit log and title.]
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Note: the original fix is from Hezi, but I rewrote the commit log, 
> which is why I authorized myself to treat my own work as being 
> "stupid". Which it really was.

:)

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> index 30059c1..5801227 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> @@ -669,8 +669,6 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_can_offload(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
>   struct i2c_msg *msgs = drv_data->msgs;
>   int num = drv_data->num_msgs;
>  
> - return false;
> -
>   if (!drv_data->offload_enabled)
>   return false;
>  
> --
> 2.6.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html