Atttaching my (already obsolete) patch, just in case...
Thanks. Double checking my code it looks similar although I don't bother
with the DMA check as the drivers know that in DMA cases the PIO call will
be made before the DMA mode is set when DMA modes are in use.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 11:01 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 23:04 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ Added Jeff, Jens and Mike Christie to Cc. I would _guess_ this is
associated with the larger block pc request stuff: Mike, Jens? James B
added for good luck.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ Added Jeff, Jens and Mike Christie to Cc. I would _guess_ this is
associated with the larger block pc request stuff: Mike, Jens? James B
added for good luck.
It apparently started happening somewhere between 2.6.19 and 2.6.20-rc2,
and doing a
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
The extremely unlikely winner is:
29b08d2bae854f66d3cfd5f57aaf2e7c2c7fce32 is first bad commit
Yeah, that's not going to be it. You probably had a bad kernel there
somewhere that you called good.
Git bisect is wonderful for figuring out
Hi Tejun,
Did you get any response back from Silicon Image?
Reference this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-idem=116727812518914w=2
While dmesg claims that 3.0Gbps was negotiated, the combined
performance of the
5 disks never exceeds 1.5Gbps, no matter how I combine them.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ 4362.972995] hdd: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete
DataRequest }
[ 4362.981475] ide: failed opcode was: unknown
[ 4362.986183] hdd: drive not ready for command
What chipsets are you guys using?
I tried 2.6.20-rc6, and forced my cdrom to be used
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
That said, I'm making progress with my bisection. 16 revisions left to
test after this, and three of those sixteen are
Remove unnecessary blk_queue_bounce in SG_IO
fix SG_IO bio leak
remove blk_queue_activity_fn
I've now
User applications using the HDIO_DRIVE_TASK ioctl specific
ATA registers to be returned to userspace.
Signed-off-by: David Milburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Two more reboots and I should know exactly which one broke nero.
This one.
However, the scary thing is that I think the patch really is correct, and
I wonder if nero has some strange work-around for an older bug.. Although
I don't see how you
Uwe, others, does this patch fix your problem?
It will have a few printk's that it spews out, but if it fixes your
problem, at least we know a bit more.
Linus
---
diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
index 2528a0c..f0ff151 100644
--- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Uwe, others, does this patch fix your problem?
I can replicate the problem now using a older box, but same driver.
It will have a few printk's that it spews out, but if it fixes your
problem, at least we know a bit more.
Linus
---
diff --git
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
rq-bio is NULL here, so no data is coped back to userspace and it seems
nero just stops trying to talk to the drive after this.
Well, except that's what we used to do in 2.6.19 too. So what changed?
Because nero just gives up, no more commands are
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
rq-bio is NULL here, so no data is coped back to userspace and it seems
nero just stops trying to talk to the drive after this.
Well, except that's what we used to do in 2.6.19 too. So what changed?
Oops, you are right. I
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:10:35AM -0800, Gary Hade wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:53:57PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Howdy,
Gary Hade wrote:
I noticed that Tejun recently provided a libata: handle 0xff status
properly patch that is now in mainline that improves this code
re:
Jim Paris wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Paprocki wrote:
On 10/30/06, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please read the following thread.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13222/focus=13235
Worked like a charm! Just patched up smartmontools now and I don't get
the failed cmds
patch 1/2: remove clearing bmdma status from cdrom_decode_status() since ATA
devices might need it as well.
patch 2/2: clear bmdma status in ide_intr() and add a new
hwif-ide_dma_clear_irq for piix.c to use.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
Actually, I do not think we did this in 2.6.19. Tomo added a bug when he
ported a patch and mixed up some things so we did something weird for
2.6.20-rc1.
Ah, ok. Warring bugs. Have you pinpointed the original one? Is it
Mike Christie wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
Actually, I do not think we did this in 2.6.19. Tomo added a bug when he
ported a patch and mixed up some things so we did something weird for
2.6.20-rc1.
Ah, ok. Warring bugs. Have you pinpointed the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:50:58 -0600
Mike Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the attached patch, nero finds the cd drives and I can burn disks.
There is no errors from the ide layer like before.
[use-old-timeout-calc.patch text/x-patch (399B)]
diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 19:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:50:58 -0600
Mike Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the attached patch, nero finds the cd drives and I can burn disks.
There is no errors from the ide layer like before.
[use-old-timeout-calc.patch
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:18:38 -0500
Mike Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. here is a fix with the overflow check sg.c has. Patch
was made against Linus's tree and tested with nero.
Userspace does not send us jiffies. Use msecs_to_jiffies
and check for overflow like sg.c
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 10:43 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
The extremely unlikely winner is:
29b08d2bae854f66d3cfd5f57aaf2e7c2c7fce32 is first bad commit
Yeah, that's not going to be it. You probably had a bad kernel there
somewhere that
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
Ok. here is a fix with the overflow check sg.c has. Patch
was made against Linus's tree and tested with nero.
Userspace does not send us jiffies. Use msecs_to_jiffies
and check for overflow like sg.c
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie [EMAIL
Zhang Rui wrote:
But how to make SATA drive S3 work properly in 2.6.16.33?
There is no simple patch which can fix S3 support in 2.6.16. You need
to backport whole libata EH including PM support. If you absolutely
have to keep using 2.6.16.33, consider backporting libata as a whole
from 2.6.19
Hello, Gary.
Gary Hade wrote:
If they verify your fix (ie,
GoVault sometimes take more than 150ms to transmit the first D2H Reg FIs
after SRST), I'll push similar patch upstream.
Thanks. If you think that changes to increase the delays are
the way to go (at least until we can find a better
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:47:27 -0600
Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a patch for sd.c I've cooked up which issues a START STOP UNIT
command to stop the drive when the SCSI disk is removed or the machine
is powered down. The rationale behind this is that apparently on many
drives,
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
What we don't want to happen is for those disks to spin down during a
reboot.
It seems that this is OK with this patch.
Also, we probably don't want them to be spun down during a kexec_load,
but
I expect that's OK too.
Actually,
27 matches
Mail list logo
