Re: [2.6.22.2 review 06/84] Add a PCI ID for santa rosas PATA controller.

2007-08-07 Thread Chr
, Chr. --- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:52:52.0 +0200 +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:55:45.0 +0200 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ enum { ich_pata_33 = 1, /* ICH up to UDMA 33 only */ ich_pata_66 = 2, /* ICH up to 66 Mhz */ ich_pata_100 = 3, /* ICH up to UDMA 100

Re: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller

2007-07-02 Thread Chr
? I've seen wrong specs, but you know To err is human. Thanks, Chr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller

2007-07-02 Thread Chr
controller -- so for me there is no emulation involved (at least afaics). I know. I wanted to say something else... but it doesn't really matter (not every operating system supports AHCI-only controllers by default...) Thanks, Chr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

[PATCH] libata: adding ICH8M PCIIDs to ATA_PIIX.

2007-06-24 Thread Chr
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gaston, Jason D wrote: I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one driver. Would they not conflict with each other? In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at that point.

libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.

2007-06-18 Thread Chr
to udma2 speeds. Thanks, Chr. (I'm not on the list, please keep the cc!) - this patch adds a necessary PCIID for santa rosa's PATA controller. Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ata_piix.c.org 2007-06-17 12:58:17.0 +0200 +++ ata_piix.c 2007-06-17 13:00

Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.

2007-06-18 Thread Chr
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Alan Cox wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200 Chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't recognized by libata's piix driver (but the old IDE Subsystem found it!). So, after adding

Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.

2007-06-18 Thread Chr
ich_pata_100 to ich_pata_133 of course!) :D Thanks, Chr. On Monday, 18. June 2007, Alan Cox wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200 Chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't recognized by libata's piix

Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.

2007-06-18 Thread Chr
, Chr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:50 AM To: Gaston, Jason D Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs. On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote: FYI

Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.

2007-06-18 Thread Chr
. But, There's life in the old dog yet. and AGP is not dead yet too! uahauh, it's a kind of spooky, with all of these zombies and braindead monsters like outlook. ;) Thanks, Chr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.

2007-06-18 Thread Chr
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Gaston, Jason D wrote: I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one driver. Would they not conflict with each other? In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at that point.