currently supported yet so the
_UNSUP variant is used.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 42 --
include/linux/libata.h |4
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata
* once deferred the command won't be repeated until another command
completes which usually is a very long time cpu-wise.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c|2 +
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 31 ++
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 62
Some PMP links are connected to internal pseudo devices which may come
and go depending on situation. There's no reason to try hard to
recover them. ATA_LFLAG_NO_RETRY tells EH to not retry if the device
attached to the link fails.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata
Some pseudo devices fail PM commands unnecessarily aborting system
suspend. Implement ATA_HORKAGE_SKIP_PM which makes libata skip PM
commands for these devices.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c |7 +++
include/linux/libata.h|1 +
2 files
is not available.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kriten Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c| 24 --
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 13 +--
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 73 +
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
Implement ATA_LFLAG_DISABLED. The flag indicates the link is disabled
due to EH recovery failure. While a link is disabled, no EH action is
taken on the link and suspend/resume become noop too.
This will be used by PMP links to manage failed links.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED
If PMP itself becomes inaccessible while trying to link a downstream
link, spending time to recover the downstream link doesn't make any
sense. Make EH skip retry and fail fast if -ERESTART is received.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c |2 +-
1 files
of helpers seem enough for both sil24 (ATAPI
exclusion needed) and cmd-switching PMP.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 22 --
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c |5 +
include/linux/libata.h|8
3 files changed, 33
Hello, all.
his is the sixth take of libata-pmp patchset. This patchset contains
10 patches and implements PMP support.
Changes from the last take[L] are.
* Better AN handling. All AHCI now can do hotplug on downstream ports
whether it has SNTF or not - patch #6 and #8 updated.
*
-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 60186f8..687419b 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -2003,6 +2003,8 @@ static int
Extend ata_acpi_associate_sata_port() such that it can handle PMP and
call it when PMP is attached and detached.
Build breakage when !CONFIG_ATA_ACPI was spotted and fixed by Petr
Vandrovec.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata
Hook PMP support into libata and enable it. Connect SCR and probing
functions, and update ata_dev_classify() to detect PMP.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 113 -
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 18 ++-
2
prereset, hardreset and postreset methods.
This patch only implements PMP support. The next patch will integrate
PMP into the reset of libata and thus enable PMP support.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/Makefile |3 +-
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 11
Implement sata_pmp_qc_defer_cmd_switch() - standard qc_defer for
command switching PMP support.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |1 +
drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c | 30 ++
include/linux/libata.h|1 +
3 files changed
As DEV_RST (hardreset) sometimes fail to recover the controller
(especially after PMP DMA CS errata). In such cases, perform PORT_RST
prior to DEV_RST.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c | 93 ++---
1 files changed
them before fetching sense data. Unfortunately, ATAPI CHECK
SENSE causes a lot of problem if command is outstanding to any other
device usually resulting in port-wide reset. So, sata_sil24
implements sil24_qc_defer() which guarantees ATAPI command is run by
itself.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL
Of course some controllers lie about PMP support. Black list them.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index dc2..ad3ff29 100644
Implement AHCI PMP support. ahci only supports command based
switching. Also, for some reason, NCQ over PMP doesn't work now.
Other than that, everything works.
Tested on ICH9R, JMB360/363 + SIMG3726, 4726 and 5744.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Forrest Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED
Private pi.flags area is full and we need more private flags. Move
host private flags over to pi.private_data. During initialization,
these flags are copied to hpriv-flags.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 63
.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Adam Blech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/pata_sis.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c b/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
index da3f720..3b5be77 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
+++ b/drivers
that. Also, pata_via should work fine under all
configurations.
This patch removes unnecessary attach failures. It seems recent via
chipsets are defaulting to different values or are actually connected
to SATA PHY triggering this more often.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata
Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:29:05 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sis_66_set_dmamode() also handles early UDMA100 (SIS630 ET) but is
missing udma timing value for UDMA100. According to sis5513, this
should be 0x8000. This caused UDMA100 device to fail on pata_sis till
In ata_set_max_sectors(), the highest nibble in LBA28 mode was
missing. This made drives sized between 8G and 128G with HPA turned
on to be resized to under 8G. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This one fixes my dumb mistake.
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |5 -
1
Jon Chelton wrote:
Hello,
I am having issues using kernel 2.6.22.1 with your latest patch
applied. I am using a Addonics 4 port SATA card with an external
enclosure and port multiplier connected to 4 250GB western digital SATA
drives. I am receiving this error frequently (on 2
Hello,
Shaohua Li wrote:
+ /* channel first and then drives for power on and verse versa for power
off */
+ if (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON)
+ acpi_bus_set_power(ap-acpi_handle, ACPI_STATE_D0);
+
+ if (ap-flags ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS)
+ max_devices++;
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:04:22PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
the code looks correct. I have one main reservation.
how can we be sure that this is active only where other hand-programmed
hotplug code is absent?
Yes, that's difficult. As Tejun pointed out, there's
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:35:05AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
The alternative would be to add a flag to the ap structure indicating
whether the hotplugging is handled by the firmware or not. If we find a
reference to a controller or port
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:53:33AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Maybe just letting both events in is the best idea. It's not like two
duplicate events are gonna break anything and I don't think many vendors
are gonna implement separate mechanism when the default SATA phy
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:08:07PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, that's the intended behavior. SATA PHY link can break from time
to time (have ever seen a SATA storage box going through ECC testing?
PHY goes offline as soon as you begin to hit it with some EM pulses
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 08/22/2007 06:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
This is useful when debugging, handling problem systems, or for
distributions just to get the system installed so it can be sorted
out later.
This is a bit smarter than the old IDE one and lets you do
libata.pata_dma=0
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:57:14 -0500
From: Sumanth J.V [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spurious completions during NCQ
I keep seeing this message a few times a day on my box.
ata1.00: exception Emask
[cc'ing Albert and linux-ide]
Alan Cox wrote:
/from the media. */
+ if (qc-nbytes 2048)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
/* No ATAPI DMA in smart mode */
if (itdev-smart)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
This looks like a gross hack. Aren't you supposed to inspect
the
Glen Larkins wrote:
I'm currently running under Edgy and kernel 2.6.17-10, and I'm still
getting timeouts just during the boot process. I've included my
current dmesg, though its a bit lengthy. This particular boot has 3 of
the 4 500g drives disconnected.
Please report kernel log including
Andrew Paprocki wrote:
1) When built with modules disabled, and libata handling the sata +
pata (AMD CS5536) connections, the pata drives come _after_ the sata
drives (i.e. w/ 2 sata drives, the first IDE drive is sdc). This makes
boot configuration more complicated if booting off the pata
Sergey Dolgov wrote:
On 9/16/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Sergey Dolgov pisze:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:19:03PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Sergey Dolgov pisze:
Hi Michal,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:33:20PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi Sergey
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
[cc'ing Albert and linux-ide]
Alan Cox wrote:
/from the media. */
+if (qc-nbytes 2048)
+return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
/* No ATAPI DMA in smart mode */
if (itdev-smart)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
This looks like a gross
[cc'ing Bruce Allen]
Andrew Paprocki wrote:
I didn't mention it before, but I'm also getting these errors every
time I boot. I'm thinking they're related to the drive not supporting
cmds that smartd is sending it. If so, is there any way that
libata/smartd can handle this more gracefully?
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Sergey Dolgov pisze:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:19:03PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Sergey Dolgov pisze:
Hi Michal,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:33:20PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 11/09/2007, Sergey Dolgov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On my
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kantor Zsolt wrote:
HDIO_DRIVE_TASKFILE is not supported in libata ? and if not then which
was the last version of
libata that supported the HDIO_DRIVE_TASKFILE command in which kernel ?
libata has never supported HDIO_DRIVE_TASKFILE.
it won't. The TASKFILE interface
Matthew Garrett wrote:
+static void ata_acpi_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
+{
+ struct ata_port *ap = data;
+ struct ata_eh_info *ehi = ap-eh_info;
+
+ ata_ehi_clear_desc(ehi);
+ ata_ehi_push_desc(ehi, ACPI event);
+ ata_ehi_hotplugged(ehi);
+
ST9120822AS 3.CLF does spurious NCQ completions, add it to NONCQ
blacklist.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
It's likely that all the drives with 3.CLF firmware are bonkers
regarding this. Maybe we should blacklist by firmware version only.
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |1 +
1
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:24:18 + Nigel Kukard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrmmm,
Jun 14 07:55:52 nigel-m2v kernel: ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port
0x0001c807
Jun 14 07:55:52 nigel-m2v kernel: ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port
0x0001c807
Jon Ivar Rykkelid wrote:
I'm having serious disk-issues when using the on-board nvidia controller
for my HDDs (My motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-N650SLI-DS4 with nvidia
chipset, cpu is intel Core2Quad)
excerpt from lspci:
00:0d.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 IDE (rev a1)
00:0e.0
Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
Thanks for that, I checked the disks and sure enough they were in an
extended self test, I aborted that and it's all back to normal.
the only problem, however, is that the system is already running version
5.37 of the smartmontools package, which is the most recent as
Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello
(please CC me when replying)
On 09/09/2007, Joris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just a note to let you know you're not alone.
I have the same problem, and someone else reported something simelar.
What sata controller are you using?
The via onboard
Michal Suchanek wrote:
What does 'smartctl -a /dev/sda' say?
Attaching output.
Hmmm... How often does the condition occur? smartlog records only two
occasions.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Tom Evans wrote:
I do not see any console or syslog messages at the time - perhaps I do
not have a debug level set appropriately?
Executing dmesg after the event should give you the messages if the
kernel has spoken anything.
Also, as an aside, I noticed that the device scan on the remote
Tom Evans wrote:
No real performance change, but the # of unaligned kernel goes from ~14
to zero on my system.
It's really just cosmetic I believe.
Care to post signed-off patch?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to
Jeff Garzik wrote:
FWIW -- as I noted to Alan personally at KS, I would rather drop the
pata_ and have it apply to all, PATA or SATA.
Having the distinction between sata and pata is also nice tho
considering many modern machines mix the two and use the P part for
ATAPI, CF kind of stuff. It's
Mark Lord wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Eddie Hung wrote:
However, I think we can conclude that ICH6M (which on the X41, has a
SATA-PATA bridge to connect a PATA drive) does not seem to support
MWDMA
It isn't clear whether the fault is at the driver or the CF device.
It's probably the bridge
Bruno Buys wrote:
Hi,
I am using debian sid in an acer notebook, and I do see the spin down
msg referred in http://linux-ata.org/shutdown.html. Linux is
2.6.22-1-686 and hd is sata. Am I to worry?
Thanks!
You better update your shutdown program. Especially so if your drive
makes funny sound
Paul Rolland wrote:
Hello,
My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is
reporting a :
irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
together with a Call Trace, but :
- irqpoll is present on the command line,
- the irq is reported to be used by
Joris wrote:
Hello List,
I have a rather annoying problem.
On an Intel S3000AHLX
(http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/s3000ah/index.htm)
motherboard, I can't seem to utilize all SATA interfaces to the
maximum.
The first sata interface frequently resets every few seconds under
Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking ta a Dell SC440 system for a friend, and it's giving HSM
violations at startup.
The system itself has an ICH7 chipset, with two seagate ST3160812AS
drives attached along with a single ST3400832AS, running kernel 2.6.22
and the ata_piix driver.
Raz wrote:
Jeff Hello
We have in our machines several sata (mostly maxtor-segate) disks in an array.
These disks generate too many ata-io errors at clients sites.
From raid1 code I have learned that a re-write sometimes fixes a disk.
Question: Why ?
Question: Does it always work ?
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Last December, I posted this: http://lwn.net/Articles/213635/
Here's an updated version. It shaves 5 seconds off boot time on my
configuration (qla2xxx, emulex, two ata_piix, dual fusion), but could
save more or less on other setups.
I think I can remove the 'sync'
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
By using the scsi async probing code, we can remove the 'sync' argument
from ata_scsi_scan_host():
Hmmm... How so? @sync is there to keep device numbering stable even
when SCSI scan fails due to allocation failure. I don't see how async
probing changes that.
--
tejun
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:14:21PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
By using the scsi async probing code, we can remove the 'sync' argument
from ata_scsi_scan_host():
Hmmm... How so? @sync is there to keep device numbering stable even
when SCSI scan fails
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:10:27PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
I think it's generally okay although it would need to spend quite some
time in -mm and we'll need to exclude several drivers which require
host-wide silence for mode programming (the current code is buggy
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Can you tell me a bit more about these drivers? Would it be possible to
convert them to one host/many channels, which would give us the exclusion
we want?
As a tangent, I would prefer a more natural representation than
current, where there is a 1-1
Alan Cox wrote:
async probing also keeps device numbering stable. As long as the device
responds within ten seconds (and the current code has half a second as
the timeout), it'll get the same number it would have had, even though
other hosts have successfully completed their probes during
Tom Evans wrote:
I decided to put the Norco 4618 card into the first PCI slot of my DS20.
It and the PMP support seem to like that location much better - I'm
successfully creating an array at the moment.
The system still responds, but accessing currently running filesystems
(another
Eddie Hung wrote:
However, I think we can conclude that ICH6M (which on the X41, has a
SATA-PATA bridge to connect a PATA drive) does not seem to support
MWDMA
It isn't clear whether the fault is at the driver or the CF device.
(especially as it is not completely supported under Windows
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Concurrent hdparm -t, like
hdparm -t /dev/sdd hdparm -t /dev/sde hdparm -t /dev/sdf hdparm -t
/dev/sdg sleep 20
(and from hdparm output visually confirmed that all activity LEDs go
on off simultaneously)
Not sure whether it matters but 'hdparm' tests are
[adding-back linux-ide, please don't drop cc's]
Eddie Hung wrote:
On 06/09/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddie Hung wrote:
However, I think we can conclude that ICH6M (which on the X41, has a
SATA-PATA bridge to connect a PATA drive) does not seem to support
MWDMA
It isn't clear
Bryan Woods wrote:
The full dmesg and hdparm -I command output are attached.
I have received word from the vendor that the Stardom 2611 will do
RAID0 or 1 under windows, but only RAID1 under Linux. (Their manual
said it worked with Linux but failed to mention the RAID mode
restriction:
Dave Jones wrote:
scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD3200AAJS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
This could have been truncated, please post the result of 'hdparm -I
/dev/sda'. Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to
]
Acked-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Joris schrieb:
Btw, out on a limb here: my board has specific combinations of sata
port usage leading to a reset. Avoiding to use sata0 (sda) (unplug the
cable) works perfectly.
Do you have the same symptoms?
No idea, no SATA here.
Joris, can you please post more
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Joris schrieb:
Hello Tomasz,
This appears remarkably simelar to what I'm experiencing, altough I'm
getting that on sata ports.
I'm currently at a loss on what caused this, but if there's two of
us... ;-)
See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=118812690407577w=2
Hello,
Mark Lord wrote:
I reported a very similar bug back a few releases ago.
Anyone who wants to try it themselves, can do this with hdparm-7.7 (from
sourceforge):
hdparm --drq-hsm-error /dev/sda
Whether or not it hangs the machine does depend upon exactly which SATA
LLD is used,
of the module does not contain
these
messages. When auditing (as I am for ioremap checking here) I am attempting
to keep changes in the style of their surroundings. Otherwise it's massive
scope screep on these patches.
Signed-off-by: Scott Thompson postfail at hushmail.com
Acked-by: Tejun Heo
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
For comparsion 1TB Hitachi behind 3726 PMP (again MS4UM) with sata_sil
patch I sent last week (no NCQ, 1.5Gbps link between 3512 and PMP, and
3.0Gbps link between PMP and drive... why is it faster?):
If you turn off NCQ by echoing 1 to /sys/block/sdd/device/queue_depth on
Eddie Hung wrote:
I am pursuing another possibility: the CF card is not a genuine
Sandisk one at all, especially as it was off eBay! I compared my
hdparm -I with the one in the thread above (which as I've found out is
a Sandisk Extreme II 4GB) and there are big differences, namely the
model
Hello,
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
I have recompiled kernel with all debugging disabled, and it brought me
1.5MBps, so it is still consistently 1MBps slower than on sil. Disabling
NCQ seems to improve concurrent access a bit (for which I have no
explanation), while slows down single drive scenario:
Eddie Hung wrote:
Hello everyone,
In the hope of making myself a cheap SSD, I decided to replace my IDE
HDD on my IBM Thinkpad X41 (non tablet) with a generic CF-IDE adaptor,
and a Sandisk Extreme IV 4Gb CF, for reasonable prices off ebay. This
was partly influenced by the report that one
. @present will be used to improve
diagnostic failure handling.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 30 --
drivers/ata/pata_scc.c|6 --
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c |2 +-
include/linux/libata.h|3 ++-
4 files
Certain device which reports diagnostic failure also reports invalid
device signature. Assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure if reset
indicates device presence.
This is fix for bugzilla bug 8784.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8784
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED
drivers/ata/Eddie Hung wrote:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: SMI MODEL
Serial Number: SZAUSWIN06E5
Firmware Revision: 20070709
Standards:
Likely used: 5
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders
dev-horkage should be cleared over device hotunplug/plug. Clear it
in ata_dev_init().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 2ad4dda..112e7a9
Move ata_id_n_sectors() upward right below ata_id_c_string(). This is
to accomodate later changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 30 +++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata
instead of 0x40
This is in preparation of ata_hpa_resize() update.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 174 -
1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata
needed
results in weird detection failure. This changed logic should be able
to handle all known cases correctly automatically.
Verified on ICH6 (reports 0 PI), ICH8 (with holes in port_map), ICH9,
JMB360 and JMB363.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Regenerated on top of the current
Some drives choke on READ_NATIVE_MAX_ADDRESS[_EXT]. Implement
ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA and apply it to affected drives.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
MAXTOR 6L080L4 added from bugzilla bug 7119.
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 11 ---
include/linux/libata.h|1 +
2
Hello,
Weksler Izik wrote:
I did it yesterday with the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from kernel.org. It
works. I don't have the dmesg output here - I'll send it to you in
the evening. Generally: It defines ATA2 as Config disk but doesn't
wait for device ID and doesn't perform several resets - no delay
Izik Weksler wrote:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: libata pmp support
Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 23 August 2007, you wrote:
Izik Weksler wrote:
Tejun,
If you're sending
Hello, Rusty.
Rusty Conover wrote:
I have some interesting results.
I had a pair of Seagate 250 GB SATA disks (models below) and tried those
out rather then the WD's.At the 1.5 gbps rather they appear to work
just fine both being on the same PMP, at 3.0 gbps they timeout just like
the
Hello, Rusty.
Rusty Conover wrote:
After all I decided to send back the piece of hardware and just switch
to a solution that has the SATA ports on the main board. Thanks for you
help trying to get all of this working, I probably just had a bad
adaptor card or drive enclosure.
3726/4726 work
Izik Weksler wrote:
On Saturday 25 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
Izik Weksler wrote:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: libata pmp support
Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 23 August 2007
chia wrote:
Dear Tejun, I have installed 10.3 Beta 2. It works in the halfway so I
need to ask your help. To the point download software to the drive and
installation are OK. However, when trying to read the data out, it
stalls for a long time (1~2 min). The same software in normal harddrive
Tejun Heo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
The current HPA handling implementation isn't robust enough and causes
regressions on several cases. This patchset contains HPA handling
update.
* blacklist devices which puke on READ_NATIVE_MAX
* proper/better error handling
Satellite U200 also shares the problem. Add it to the broken suspend
list. Original patch from John Schember.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Schember [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata
Does the attached patch make any difference?
--
tejun
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: work1/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===
--- work1.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++
Rusty Conover wrote:
After adding a semicolon to the added line, and recompiling there are
still timeouts like before on the PMP ports.
Oops.
It did have the effect of setting the SATA speed to 1.5 rather then 3.0
on boot though.
Yeah, that was the intention. I'm running out of ideas.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
Hello,
Now that the AHCI driver has support for all controllers with the 0x0106
(AHCI) class code, I am not planning on adding controller DeviceID's for
AHCI controllers. I want to verify that this is the correct course of
action.
Note: I still
Some notebooks need bit18 of IOCFG to be cleared for the drive bay to
work even though the bit is NOOP according to the datasheet. This
patch implement IOCFG bit18 quirk and apply it to Clevo M570U.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8051
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Izik Weksler wrote:
Tejun,
If you're sending the patch please send it to this address.
Okay, please test the attached patch and please cc
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org when replying. Thanks.
--
tejun
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 06f212f..d838bdd 100644
---
chia-ming liu wrote:
Dear Tejun, I am not very good at linux and just enough to get by. I
have tried to use your patch by issuing the command 'patch -p1
combined.patch' and I receive this
msvlsi63:~/libata-tj-2.6.18.1-20061020 # patch -p1 combined.patch
can't find file to patch at input
Rusty Conover wrote:
Hi Tejun,
Just as some further testing and poking I added the drives to the list
of disks to disable NCQ for, it didn't resolve the issue.
I increased the PMP timeout to 1000 rather then 250 and that didn't
resolve the problem either.
The interface still has
chia wrote:
Dear Tejun, Is 10.3 beta stable? Do I still need to patch it? If I do,
what version I should use? Can I apply a higher version patch to lower
version of kernel? Thanks!
It's beta after all so it wouldn't be too stable but you don't need to
patch anything.
--
tejun
-
To
801 - 900 of 2104 matches
Mail list logo
