Re: ATA ACPI needs Mr interpreter, would you please shut up? flag

2007-12-14 Thread Tejun Heo
I take it back. I found how to satisfy neurotic BIOSen. Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

ATA ACPI needs Mr interpreter, would you please shut up? flag

2007-12-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, all. During 2.6.24-rc1, libata enabled ATA-ACPI support by default and there have been a lot of regression reports stemming from it. I have patchset ready to fix most of the problems. With these patches applied, libata should be able to cope with most failures pretty well. There is one

Re: ATA ACPI needs Mr interpreter, would you please shut up? flag

2007-12-13 Thread Robert Hancock
Tejun Heo wrote: Hello, all. During 2.6.24-rc1, libata enabled ATA-ACPI support by default and there have been a lot of regression reports stemming from it. I have patchset ready to fix most of the problems. With these patches applied, libata should be able to cope with most failures pretty

Re: ATA ACPI needs Mr interpreter, would you please shut up? flag

2007-12-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Robert Hancock wrote: Problem is that _GTM implementation on certain BIOSen crap themselves if invoked on empty channels. However, as written above, because initial _GTM caching is done before any actual operation is performed on the port, libata can't determine whether the port is occupied