Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Daniel Drake wrote:
Otto Meier wrote:
My question is also are these features (NCQ/TCQ) and the heigher
datarate be supported by this
modification? or is only the basic f
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>
> >>>Oh, and forget TCQ. It's a completely worthless technology inherited
> >>
> >>>from PATA,
> >>
> >>Agreed.
> >>
> >>There are a few controllers where we may -ev
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
Oh, and forget TCQ. It's a completely worthless technology inherited
from PATA,
Agreed.
There are a few controllers where we may -eventually- add TCQ support,
controllers that do 100% of TCQ in hardware. But t
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >Oh, and forget TCQ. It's a completely worthless technology inherited
> >from PATA,
>
> Agreed.
>
> There are a few controllers where we may -eventually- add TCQ support,
> controllers that do 100% of TCQ in hardware. But that's so f
Jens Axboe wrote:
Oh, and forget TCQ. It's a completely worthless technology inherited
from PATA,
Agreed.
There are a few controllers where we may -eventually- add TCQ support,
controllers that do 100% of TCQ in hardware. But that's so far down the
priority list, it's below just about every
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Daniel Drake wrote:
> >
> >>Otto Meier wrote:
> >>
> >>>My question is also are these features (NCQ/TCQ) and the heigher
> >>>datarate be supported by this
> >>>modification? or is only the basic feature set of sat
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Daniel Drake wrote:
Otto Meier wrote:
My question is also are these features (NCQ/TCQ) and the heigher
datarate be supported by this
modification? or is only the basic feature set of sata 150 TX4 supported?
NCQ support is under development. Search the
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Otto Meier wrote:
> > >My question is also are these features (NCQ/TCQ) and the heigher
> > >datarate be supported by this
> > >modification? or is only the basic feature set of sata 150 TX4 supported?
> >
> > N
On Mon, Aug 01 2005, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Otto Meier wrote:
> >My question is also are these features (NCQ/TCQ) and the heigher
> >datarate be supported by this
> >modification? or is only the basic feature set of sata 150 TX4 supported?
>
> NCQ support is under development. Search the archives
Otto Meier wrote:
My question is also are these features (NCQ/TCQ) and the heigher
datarate be supported by this
modification? or is only the basic feature set of sata 150 TX4 supported?
NCQ support is under development. Search the archives for Jens Axboe's recent
patches to support this. I d
Daniel Drake wrote:
Otto Meier wrote:
This card use the sata chip pdc 40718 (as of my card)
the lastest sata_promise kernel with sata promise patch driver
doesn't recognise
this card.
I added the following line to static struct pci_device_id
pdc_ata_pci_tbl[] in sata_promise.c:
{ PCI_VENDO
Daniel Drake wrote:
Otto Meier wrote:
This card use the sata chip pdc 40718 (as of my card)
the lastest sata_promise kernel with sata promise patch driver
doesn't recognise
this card.
I added the following line to static struct pci_device_id
pdc_ata_pci_tbl[] in sata_promise.c:
{ PCI_VENDO
Otto Meier wrote:
This card use the sata chip pdc 40718 (as of my card)
the lastest sata_promise kernel with sata promise patch driver doesn't
recognise
this card.
I added the following line to static struct pci_device_id
pdc_ata_pci_tbl[] in sata_promise.c:
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE,
13 matches
Mail list logo
