On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Robert Hancock wrote:
This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
a
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 21:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Robert Hancock wrote:
This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
a
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The SCSI midlayer makes a lot of if scsi version = 2 choices. In the
case of ATAPI, we do not want to force ATAPI down the path of ancient
SCSI devices, as this disables some MMC features that modern ATAPI
devices support.
If I fully
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:57 +0200, Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 06:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The SCSI midlayer makes a lot of if scsi version = 2 choices. In the
case of ATAPI, we do not want to force ATAPI down the path of ancient
SCSI devices, as this disables some
(cc-ing linux-ide)
Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
Hello all,
First of all, let me introduce myself a little bit. I am the responsable
for the development of the Nero Linux burning application. So I have
access to all the source code of the application.
Now let's go with the story: It seems that there
Robert Hancock wrote:
This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
a value like 5 in there as well, if it complies with SPC-4..
