Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
But anyway: Sorry, am I the only one that gets nervous if we start to
run a ATA-Hardware (Intels recent ICH southbridges in this case) with a
speed grade (Ultra ATA/133) that is not specified by its manufacturer in
his public data sheets (Ultra ATA/100 max)?
That's why
On 06.07.2007 21:45, Chr wrote:
> On Friday, 6. July 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a
>>> "off-by-one error" in ata_piix.c,
> do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770:
> [...]
>> I quickly tried this patch on an ICH7-R system with an ATA133 Maxtor
On Friday, 6. July 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> >> > On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a
> >"off-by-one error" in ata_piix.c,
> >> > do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770:
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >
> >Thanks,
> > Chr.
> >
> >
>
> I quickly tried this patch on an ICH7-R system with an AT
L PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel
>Santa Rosa PATA controller
>
>On Wednesday, 4. July 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>
>> Maybe Alan or someone from Intel can answer that and thus
>tell us how to
>> move forward; it wou
> Maybe Alan or someone from Intel can answer that and thus tell us how to
> move forward; it would be really nice to get the patch that started this
> thread (it got posted by Chuck again today) could go into 2.6.22, but I
> assume the time runs away...
Folks should be back Monday I suspect. Its
On Wednesday, 4. July 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> Maybe Alan or someone from Intel can answer that and thus tell us how to
> move forward; it would be really nice to get the patch that started this
> thread (it got posted by Chuck again today) could go into 2.6.22, but I
> assume the time ru
On 02.07.2007 16:36, Chr wrote:
> On Monday, 2. July 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> but Alan Cox wrote:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide%40vger.kernel.org/msg07417.html
Its ich_pata_133 - all the newer chips are.
>> Intel afaik never supported Ultra ATA 133 officially in any of
On Monday, 2. July 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > but Alan Cox wrote:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide%40vger.kernel.org/msg07417.html
> >> Its ich_pata_133 - all the newer chips are.
>
> Intel afaik never supported Ultra ATA 133 officially in any of the
> mainstream desktop or mobile
On 02.07.2007 13:24, Chr wrote:
> On Monday, 2. July 2007, you wrote:
>> On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Hmmm. From looking at the ICH8-Datasheet (
>> http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/313056.htm
>> or http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/31305603.pdf )
>>
On Monday, 2. July 2007, you wrote:
> On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hmmm. From looking at the ICH8-Datasheet (
> http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/313056.htm
> or http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/31305603.pdf )
> page 189 and later it seems to me that
On 02.07.2007 07:02, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 28.06.2007 21:47, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> On 06/28/2007 03:16 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>
>> [Forgot to mark subj: as a patch; attached]
>>
>>> From: Christian Lamparter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controll
On 28.06.2007 21:47, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 06/28/2007 03:16 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> [Forgot to mark subj: as a patch; attached]
>
>> From: Christian Lamparter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <[EMAIL
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/28/2007 03:16 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
[Forgot to mark subj: as a patch; attached]
Sorry, using attachments (a) decreases reviewers and (b) makes your
patch HARDER to apply. See #7 under Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this li
13 matches
Mail list logo
