Just a note to let you know that with the series of 11 patches I just sent, libata is almost sparse-clean on X86_32 (~250 sparse warnings to ~40).
The remaining warnings are: drivers/ata/libata-core.c:7089:7: warning: symbol 'rc' shadows an earlier one drivers/ata/libata-core.c:7030:9: originally declared here drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5610:2: warning: context imbalance in 'ata_hsm_move' - different lock contexts for basic block drivers/ata/libata-core.c:4821:20: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5039:9: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5194:9: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction drivers/ata/libata-core.c:6664:20: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction [repeated 29 times, will look at possibly silencing this if it can be done nicely] include/linux/libata.h:1214:13: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction include/linux/scatterlist.h:184:9: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c:1865:14: warning: symbol 'ata_scsiop_inq_89' was not declared. Should it be static? Same issue as the FIT macro replacement patch I did, except open-coded min_t and max_t. drivers/ata/pata_amd.c:59:11: warning: symbol '__x' shadows an earlier one drivers/ata/pata_amd.c:59:11: originally declared here Other than that drivers/ata is sparse clean. Cheers, Harvey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
