Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:32:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
* sata_promise: Generally works okay; however there are still some
problems with recent 3Gbps chips. (Mikael, please pitch in)
Right, 2nd-gen 3Gbps chips have had intermittent issues,
which we hope are cured by the
Patric Karlsson writes:
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:32:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
* sata_promise: Generally works okay; however there are still some
problems with recent 3Gbps chips. (Mikael, please pitch in)
Right, 2nd-gen 3Gbps chips have had intermittent
On 2007-12-13 15:09, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Patric Karlsson writes:
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:32:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
* sata_promise: Generally works okay; however there are still some
problems with recent 3Gbps chips. (Mikael, please pitch in)
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:32:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
* sata_promise: Generally works okay; however there are still some
problems with recent 3Gbps chips. (Mikael, please pitch in)
Right, 2nd-gen 3Gbps chips have had intermittent issues,
which we hope are cured by
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Thanks for the excellent rundown.
sata_sil24: 3124/3132 chips don't have any outstanding serious
problems. IRQ loss on PCI-X was the only recent serious known
problem but it's fixed now.
I'm still a little confused how to translate this known-good chipset to
an
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Thanks for the excellent rundown.
sata_sil24: 3124/3132 chips don't have any outstanding serious
problems. IRQ loss on PCI-X was the only recent serious known
problem but it's fixed now.
I'm still a little confused how to translate this known-good chipset to
an
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Jim Paris wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Thanks for the excellent rundown.
sata_sil24: 3124/3132 chips don't have any outstanding serious
problems. IRQ loss on PCI-X was the only recent serious known
problem but it's fixed now.
I'm still a little confused how to
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
I read with interest I. Straford's current trials and tribulations
with the Promise SATA300 TX4. Do people have a favorite
alternative to this card that plays well with Linux? I've read the
chipset compatibility list, but am not sure how to boil that
information down
Tejun Heo wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
I read with interest I. Straford's current trials and tribulations
with the Promise SATA300 TX4. Do people have a favorite
alternative to this card that plays well with Linux? I've read the
chipset compatibility list, but am not sure how to boil that
Tejun Heo wrote:
* marvell ones: I don't have much idea. Jeff? Mark?
..
Right now, support is rather primitive and incomplete in sata_mv.
That may change over the next few months, as Marvell is beginning to
show some desire to have their chips fully supported, to/beyond the
current levels
Thanks for the excellent rundown.
sata_sil24: 3124/3132 chips don't have any outstanding serious
problems. IRQ loss on PCI-X was the only recent serious known
problem but it's fixed now.
I'm still a little confused how to translate this known-good chipset to
an actual buyable PCI card. It
I read with interest I. Straford's current trials and tribulations
with the Promise SATA300 TX4. Do people have a favorite
alternative to this card that plays well with Linux? I've read the
chipset compatibility list, but am not sure how to boil that
information down to an actual buyable SATA
12 matches
Mail list logo
