On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:28:22AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
That would be nice. Muli, want to make a patch for this?
Sure, I'll put something together.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:17:03PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, that's wierd. I thought I got something, until I realized that
you are doing a lot of logic before you ever even determine that
your hardware is present in the system. Why are you calling
calgary_locate_bbars() and doing all of
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:16:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use
pci_get_device() instead? Why do you need to walk the device list
backwards? Do you get false positives going forward?
It's not strictly needed, we used it for symmetry. Feel
no longer recall what it was. Some
reason the real PCI driver API didn't fit at the time. If someone
were to whip up a working patch, I'd happily apply it.
Feel free to nuke it and walk the list forward.
So something like the patch below would be fine?
Yep, looks good.
Acked-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda