Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Using default methods caused the chip's DMA PRD count registers, inadvertently
starting DMA! While fixing it, also do:
nasty, this could possibly explain the following trm290.c hack:
Frankly speaking, I'm not sure it's that destructive: the
Using default methods caused the chip's DMA PRD count registers, inadvertently
starting DMA! While fixing it, also do:
- get rid of the 'ide_' prefixes in several functions for which the prefix in
the method's name has been 'ide_' ectomized already;
- align the code hooking the IDE DMA
On Thursday 27 December 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Using default methods caused the chip's DMA PRD count registers, inadvertently
starting DMA! While fixing it, also do:
nasty, this could possibly explain the following trm290.c hack:
...
#if 0 /* play it safe for now */
Those two methods were reading/writing TRM-290 config. register; luckily (?)
the writes only tried to change undefined bits. While fixing this, also
- get rid of the 'ide_' prefixes in several functions for which the prefix has
been ectomized before;
- align the code initializing methods in
Hello, I wrote:
Those two methods were reading/writing TRM-290 config. register; luckily (?)
the writes only tried to change undefined bits.
Actually, the writes were falling at the PRD address register. Well,
nobody noticed anyway... :-)
MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
