Hello,
Am Mo, 28.01.2008, 01:17, schrieb Tejun Heo:
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With one, two and three drives on the pm I got no errors, so I tried to
change the power supply. I got two power supplies for the 16
harddrives and the second one (with all Maxtor drives and the first pm)
Hello, Dusty.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shuffling the drives did not change anything to the linkspeed of the 3
ports running with 1.5 Gbps. Looks like the problem is port-related.
Hmm... Okay. Maybe the signal traces or connectors have some problems.
But 3.0Gbps on downstream port doesn't
On Monday 28 January 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
[ 0.00] If you got timer trouble try acpi_use_timer_override
This is from the dmesg of my previous post.
Can anyone tell me what it actually means?
--
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury,
On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
1. Wrong mailing list; use linux-ide (@vger) instead.
What, and keep all us other interested people in the dark?
As a test, I tried rebooting to the latest fedora kernel and found it
- Fix probe logic to support multiple devices better
- Fold in qdi and winbond support
- Fix promise 202C30 probe
- Restructure
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
linux.vanilla-2.6.24/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
linux-2.6.24/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
---
On Sunday 27 January 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
BTW what happend to patch #23?
my bad, the patch got eaten by gmail's spam filter...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Use qc_defer to serialize the two channels
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
linux.vanilla-2.6.24/drivers/ata/pata_sl82c105.c
linux-2.6.24/drivers/ata/pata_sl82c105.c
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.24/drivers/ata/pata_sl82c105.c
On Monday 28 January 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Zan Lynx wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:50 -0500, Calvin Walton wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:35 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Unfortunately we also see:
[
Added Alan to CC: list.
[ 30.703188] scsi0 : pata_amd
[ 30.709313] scsi1 : pata_amd
[ 30.710076] ata1: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xf000 irq 14
[ 30.710079] ata2: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xf008 irq 15
[ 30.864753] ata1.00: ATA-6: WDC
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greeting;
I had to reboot early this morning due to a freezeup, and I had a bunch of
these in the messages log:
==
Jan 27 19:42:11 coyote kernel: [42461.915961] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct
0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
Jan 27 19:42:11 coyote kernel:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Richard Heck wrote:
I've recently seen this kind of error myself, under Fedora 8, using the
Fedora 2.6.23 kernels: I'd see a train of the same sort of error:
Jan 28 04:46:25 coyote kernel: [26550.290016] ata1.00: exception Emask
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Gene Heskett writes:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
1. Wrong mailing list; use linux-ide (@vger) instead.
What, and keep all us other interested people in
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:50 -0500, Calvin Walton wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:35 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Unfortunately we also see:
[ 48.285456] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
[ 48.549725] ACPI: PCI
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mark Lord wrote:
..
Another way is to use the make_bad_sector utility that
is included in the source tarball for hdparm-7.7, as follows:
make_bad_sector --readback /dev/sda 474507
Apparently not in the rpm, darnit.
..
That's okay. It should
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure
it's not a hardware issue that's developed recently)?
I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of people if you, or
someone, could explain in moderate detail how this might be done. I
tried
Mark Lord wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
..
And so far no one has tried to comment on those 2 dmesg lines I've quoted a
couple of times now, here's another:
[0.00] Nvidia board detected. Ignoring ACPI timer override.
[0.00] If you got timer trouble try acpi_use_timer_override
what
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:38:40PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
[ 31.195305] ata2.00: ATAPI: LITE-ON DVDRW SHM-165H6S, HS06, max UDMA/66
[ 31.243813] ata2.01: ATA-7: MAXTOR STM3320620A, 3.AAE, max UDMA/100
[ 31.243816] ata2.01: 625142448 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
[ 31.243825]
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
* Remove 'struct pci_dev *dev' argument from ide_hwif_setup_dma().
* Un-static ide_hwif_setup_dma() and add CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=n version.
* Add 'const struct ide_port_info *d' argument to ide_device_add[_all]().
* Factor out generic ports
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Richard Heck wrote:
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure it's
not a hardware issue that's developed recently)?
I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of people if you, or someone,
could explain in
On Monday 28 January 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
While reading this msg as it came back, I locked up again and rebooted to
2.6.24, and got lucky (maybe) as the attached dmesg will show quite a few
instances of this LNNNGG before the nvidia driver is loaded to taint the
kernel. Have fun guys!
Thanks Sergei. I tested with 0x0407. There is still no interrupt
generated from the controller. The following are the register values
after soft reset of the SATA port. Any idea for no interrupt from SATA
controller?
Thanks for your help,
Successfully done SATA_DoSoftReset loop = 1388
Gene Heskett writes:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
1. Wrong mailing list; use linux-ide (@vger) instead.
What, and keep all us other interested people in the dark?
As a test, I tried rebooting to the
Hello.
Mike Zheng wrote:
From PCI config space, the VENDOR_ID and DEVICE_ID are correct for my
driver. However the PCI_COMMAND register of 88SE6121 I got is 0x7,
which is the same as default value. Based on the document, it has to
be 0x0207 to enable interrupt. However I always failed to do
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greeting;
I had to reboot early this morning due to a freezeup, and I had a
bunch of these in the messages log:
==
Jan 27 19:42:11 coyote kernel: [42461.915961] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct
0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
Jan 27 19:42:11 coyote kernel:
After commit 7267c3377443322588cddaf457cf106839a60463
wait_drive_not_busy() can become static again.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c |2 +-
include/linux/ide.h|2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mark Lord wrote:
[ 64.037975] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 64.038102] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x65
[ 64.038227] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:58:89:3d:07/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma
45056 in [ 64.038229] res
[ 64.037975] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 64.038102] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x65
[ 64.038227] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:58:89:3d:07/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 45056
in
[ 64.038229] res 51/40:58:8b:3d:07/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x9
(media error)
[
On Monday 28 January 2008, Zan Lynx wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:50 -0500, Calvin Walton wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:35 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Unfortunately we also see:
[ 48.285456] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints
- ide_scan_pcibus() can become static
- instead of ide_scan_pci() we can use ide_scan_pcibus() directly
in module_init()
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ide/ide-scan-pci.c |9 ++---
include/linux/ide.h|1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8
ide_dma_on can be unexported.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
38b0717b827649511b15fbef6f98c891eda835ff
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
index 5bf3203..15f8c6a 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
@@ -474,8 +474,6 @@ void
(linux-ide cc'ed)
Ignacy Gawedzki wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:03:02PM -0600, thus spake Robert Hancock:
Ignacy Gawedzki wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm having trouble to determine the cause of the following behavior. I'm
not
even sure that I'm supposed to hot plug and unplug a SATA drive from
Adrian Bunk wrote:
piix_merge_scr() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
f272ad2ac4274a59f0b43cfd65488c51855132d4
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
index a65c8ae..1a5c3bf 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++
piix_merge_scr() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
f272ad2ac4274a59f0b43cfd65488c51855132d4
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
index a65c8ae..1a5c3bf 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7
Hi All,
I am doing development of device driver of 88SE6121 on Kernel 2.4 for
PowerPC 8568 board, which is a BIG endian CPU.
From PCI config space, the VENDOR_ID and DEVICE_ID are correct for my
driver. However the PCI_COMMAND register of 88SE6121 I got is 0x7,
which is the same as default
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
I believe at this point, its moot. I captured quite a few instances of that
error message while rebooting the last time, all of which occurred long
before I logged in and did a startx (I boot to runlevel 3 here), so the
kernel was NOT tainted at
Kuan Luo wrote:
Robert worte.
Kuan, does this patch (using the notifiers to see if the command is
really done) still work if one port on the controller has
ADMA disabled
because it's in ATAPI mode? I seem to recall Allen Martin mentioning
that notifiers wouldn't work in this case.
I just
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Richard Heck wrote:
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Can you switch back to old IDE to get your work done (and to make sure
it's not a hardware issue that's developed recently)?
I think it'd be really, REALLY helpful to a lot of
We've got a bit of a problem with the sata_nv driver that I'm trying to
figure out a decent solution to (hence all the lists CCed). This is the
situation:
The nForce4 ADMA hardware has 2 modes: legacy mode, where it acts like a
normal ATA controller with 32-bit DMA limits, and ADMA mode where
This patch adds the Intel ICH10 IDE mode SATA Controller DeviceID's.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.24/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c.orig2008-01-24 14:58:37.0
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.24/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2008-01-28 14:58:22.0 -0800
@@ -263,6 +263,14
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Building this and installing it along with the appropriate initrd (which
might be handled by Fedora's install scripts)
Or mine, which I've been using for years.
You're ahead of a surprising number of
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Building this and installing it along with the appropriate initrd (which
might be handled by Fedora's install scripts)
Or mine, which I've been using
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Building this and installing it along with the appropriate initrd (which
might be handled by Fedora's
robert wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
Robert worte.
Kuan, does this patch (using the notifiers to see if the
command is
really done) still work if one port on the controller has
ADMA disabled
because it's in ATAPI mode? I seem to recall Allen Martin
mentioning
that notifiers wouldn't
Gene Heskett wrote:
..
That's ok, dd seemed to do the job also.
..
The two programs operate entirely differently from each other,
so it may still be worth trying the make_bad_sector utility there.
dd goes through the regular kernel I/O calls,
whereas make_bad_sector sends raw ATA commands
On Jan 29, 2008 11:08 AM, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The last solution I tried was to set the DMA mask on both ports to
32-bit on slave_configure when an ATAPI device is connected. However,
this runs into complications as well. This is run on initialization and
when trying to
No like with only a drive attached and no PMP. The driver is still
unable to IDENTIFY the connected disk:
failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x20)
On Jan 28, 2008 1:51 AM, Thomas Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/08, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm... That's strange. If
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:08:44PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
The
thought of using the SCSI struct device for DMA mapping was brought up
at one point.. any thoughts on that?
I believe this will work on some architectures and not others.
Anything that uses include/asm-generic/dma-mapping.h
Thomas Evans wrote:
No like with only a drive attached and no PMP. The driver is still
unable to IDENTIFY the connected disk:
failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x20)
So, the problem is not specific to PMP support. That makes more sense.
Does moving the controller to different slot
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:35 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Gene Heskett writes:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
1. Wrong mailing list; use linux-ide (@vger)
I've tried it in various slots on both PCI hoses - no difference.
...tom
Tejun Heo wrote:
Thomas Evans wrote:
No like with only a drive attached and no PMP. The driver is still
unable to IDENTIFY the connected disk:
failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x20)
So, the problem is
On Monday 28 January 2008, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
[...]
We have no way of debugging that module, so please try 2.6.24 without it.
Sorry, I can't do this and have a working machine. The nv driver has
suffered bit rot or something since the FC2 days when it COULD run a 19
crt at 1600x1200,
Hi Bart,
[...]
the BKL in idetape_write_release() with finer-grained locking etc, probably
also
some pipeline improvements, removal of OnStream support, etc. but that'll
come
later.
On-Stream support has been long gone but it seems that deprecation
warning etc. managed to
The ideal solution would be to do mapping against a different struct
device for each port, so that we could maintain the proper DMA mask for
each of them at all times. However I'm not sure if that's possible.
I cannot imagine why it should be that difficult. The PCI subsystem
could over a
Robert wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
Robert worte.
Kuan, does this patch (using the notifiers to see if the
command is
really done) still work if one port on the controller has
ADMA disabled
because it's in ATAPI mode? I seem to recall Allen Martin
mentioning
that notifiers wouldn't
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 23:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
[...]
snip
I can invalidate this theory...
i helped a guy on irc debug this problem, and he had ati. I tried having
him stop using fglrx, and go to r300.. same problem, and same problem
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:31:57PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
In my script, its one line:
mkinitrd -f initrd-$VER.img $VER \
where $VER is the shell variable I edit to = the version number, located at
the top of the script.
Unforch, its failing:
No module pata_amd found for kernel
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:13:21 -0500
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to reboot early this morning due to a freezeup, and I had a
bunch of these in the messages log:
==
Jan 27 19:42:11 coyote kernel: [42461.915961] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0
SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0
57 matches
Mail list logo
