On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:57:54AM -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 7:24 AM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a long time kernel tester, I see some problem with the
> > newer "new development model". In the short merge windows,
> > after to much time, there are to many
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> > Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros
> > (gentoo->ubuntu)
> > and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc or -mm kernels (I
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:50:08PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that years ago bisection of
>> a bug was a very laborous task so that it was only used as a final,
>> last-ditch approach for really nasty bugs. Today we can autono
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:18:43PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:50:08PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that years ago bisection
>>>> of a b
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
>> I did bisecting myself, and I know that it costs time and work.
>>
>> But the first point is the above one that it makes otherwise nearly
>> undebuggable problems debuggable an
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> I did bisecting myself, and I know that it costs time and work.
>>>>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:26:05PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ..
>> Another point is that it shifts the work from the few experienced
>> developers to the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:46:49PM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:30:35PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > There is this silly limit that noone can work more than 168 hours per
> > week on the Linux kernel, and some kernel developers seem to take the
> >
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32:19PM +, Russell King wrote:
>...
> There's another issue I want to raise concerning bugzilla. We have the
> classic case of "not enough people reading bugzilla bugs" - which is one
> of the biggest problems with bugzilla. Virtually no one in the ARM
> community l
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:13:46PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:26:05PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> ..
>>> If you've been making significant updates to a driver/subsystem,
>>> and people are reporting that it is
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>...
> > On Saturday 24 November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 24 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>...
> > - zillion other l
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:07:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>..
> > First of all, Bugzilla is a quite often used bug tracker in the open
> > source world [1], so many users already know it.
> >
> > But m
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >..
> > >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:28:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:38:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > On Sun, No
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:30:06AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > That's not possible, but as already said it's not required.
> > And more important, it's unrelated to any problems we have.
> >
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> * Replace driver versions in comments by DRV_VERSION define.
>
> * Add MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION) to drivers defining DRV_VERSION.
>...
Could you limit this to actively maintained version numbers and also
remove the
Commit 9b8e8de7e59b3a2dab3113d620b52dc8ba890fb3 did:
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -872,7 +872,8 @@ int ata_scsi_slave_config(struct scsi_device *sdev)
ata_scsi_sdev_config(sdev);
- sdev->manage_start_stop = 1;
+ if (dev->class == ATA_D
After commit 7267c3377443322588cddaf457cf106839a60463
wait_drive_not_busy() can become static again.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c |2 +-
include/linux/ide.h|2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -
- ide_scan_pcibus() can become static
- instead of ide_scan_pci() we can use ide_scan_pcibus() directly
in module_init()
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ide/ide-scan-pci.c |9 ++---
include/linux/ide.h|1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions
ide_dma_on can be unexported.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
38b0717b827649511b15fbef6f98c891eda835ff
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
index 5bf3203..15f8c6a 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
@@ -474,8 +474,6 @
piix_merge_scr() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
f272ad2ac4274a59f0b43cfd65488c51855132d4
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
index a65c8ae..1a5c3bf 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
@@ -1068,7 +
(.text+0x15107): Section mismatch in reference
from the function piix_init_one() to the function
.devinit.text:piix_check_450nx_errata()
...
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
222e97f95d38ce7cb41980671cc4383df28b5f7a
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_pi
This patch fixes the following section mismatch:
<-- snip -->
...
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3b641c): Section mismatch in reference from the
function .pmac_ide_setup_device() to the function
.init.text:.pmac_ide_setup_dma()
...
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
deb88131c2fcc3076121597463153979aba9062d diff --git
a/drivers/ide/legacy/gayle.c b/drivers/ide/legacy/gayle.c
index 9d3851d..b7d8109 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/legacy/gayle.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/legacy/gayle.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ stat
Commit 9e016a719209d95338e314b46c3012cc7feaaeec causes the following
compile error:
<-- snip -->
...
CC drivers/ide/arm/bast-ide.o
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ide/arm/bast-ide.c: In
function 'bastide_register':
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ide
ops.c: wait_for_ready
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ide/ide-iops.c |6 --
drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c |2 --
drivers/ide/pci/cy82c693.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c.old
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:56:23PM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used.
> A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work.
> Is the following patches correct?
>
> diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:04:37AM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used.
> > > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work.
> > > Is the following patche
This patch removes some dead IDE-related #define's and
"static inline" functions.
Please double-check it since I've only tested it with grep and didn't
try compilation.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arc
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 03:39:29AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>...
> In the future, please use "---" not "--" as the separator your .sig, so
> that it is not copied into the kernel changelog by git-applymbox.
>...
"-- " is the standard separator most MUAs can interpret - "---" would
therefore be
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:59:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-mm1:
>...
> +toshiba-tc86c001-ide-driver-take-2.patch
>...
> Misc.
>...
This patch makes the needlessly global init_hwif_tc86c001() static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PR
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
involve
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any othe
This patch makes the following needlessly global functions static:
- libata-core.c: ata_qc_complete_internal()
- libata-scsi.c: ata_scsi_qc_new()
- libata-scsi.c: ata_dump_status()
- libata-scsi.c: ata_to_sense_error()
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ata/
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
involve
;:
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1/drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.c:421:
undefined reference to `pci_get_legacy_ide_irq'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
<-- snip -->
This fixes kernel Bugzilla #6644.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.20-
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:49:30PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > It's unlikely that this driver will ever be of any use on other
> > architectures.
>
> It is already used on PPC.
>
> [ see arch/powerpc/platforms
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:27:48PM -0500, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>...
> A lot of developers (including me) will be gone next week for
> Linux.Conf.Au, so you have a week of rest and quiet to test this, and
> report any problems.
>
> Not that there will be any, right? You all behave now!
>...
Th
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
involve
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 05:16:21AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 2.6.19.2:
> # hddtemp /dev/sda
> /dev/sda: WDC WD740GD-00FLC0: 27C
>
> 2.6.20-rc5:
> # hddtemp /dev/sda
> /dev/sda: ATA WDC WD740GD-00FL: S.M.A.R.T. not available
Subject: `hddtemp' no longer works
References : http://lkml.org/
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any oth
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc6 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc6 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
at it, I also moved the prototype of this struct to a header
file.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ata/libata.h |3 +++
drivers/ata/pata_sis.c |3 ++-
drivers/ata/sata_sis.c |4 +---
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:47:18PM +0100, Patrick Ale wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Patrick,
> With kernel 2.6.19 I was able to boot using the pata_via driver
> I tried to compile 2.6.20-rc6 and now I get a "unknown device: sda3"
> error when I try to boot.
>
> I compiled 2.6.20-rc6 by copying over the .conf
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 05:58:19AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> >Hi Jeff, linux-ide,
> >I'm having troubles with libata and UDF on RW media. See below.
> >
> >Il Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:42:34PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt ha scritto:
> >>On Jan 30 2007 21:36, Luca Tettamanti wrot
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:48:04PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> > index db185f3..d51f0f1 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config IA64
> >
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Update:
> >
> > I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
> > The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
>
> Known bug, will be fixed soon.
Is this a variation of
S
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:28:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> Update:
> >>>
> >>> I get the s
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc1 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc1 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:03:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1:
>...
> +ata-ahci-alpm-expose-power-management-policy-option-to-users.patch
>...
> ata things
>...
scsi_host_link_pm_policy() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian B
tatic.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
91a4450d6bf353600316328f0a95299e8bb17ee0
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index ce631eb..1db065c 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static const stru
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:51:06AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.23-rc2-mm1:
>...
> +ide-ide-hook-acpi-psx-method-to-ide-power-on-off.patch
>...
> IDE tree updates
>...
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ide_acpi_set_state)
Signed-off-by
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:42:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.23-rc1-mm2:
>...
> +ide-ide-remove-ide-dma-check.patch
>
> IDE tree updates
>...
static code mustn't be exported.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
8cc91254
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:06:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.23-rc2-mm2:
>...
> +ide-ide-remove-hwif-autodma-and-drive-autodma.patch
>...
> IDE tree updates
>...
noautodma can now be unexported.
Signed-off-by: Adrian B
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:58:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.23-rc3-mm1:
>...
> git-block.patch
>...
> git trees
>...
ide_get_error_location() is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
noautodma can now be unexported.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch has been sent on:
- 27 Aug 2007
957dc7601c050cb14a7afc842db0c2d62aaf3509
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide.c b/drivers/ide/ide.c
index b3b5f00..5b09066 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide.c
+++ b/drive
This patch fixes an obvious array overrun spotted by the Coverity
checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
9101f2e2691094244bd147a05225f6c84bdf7404
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_cs5536.c b/drivers/ata/pata_cs5536.c
index 53070f6..00039a1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_
This patch adds a missing "else" that was missing in
commit c77a89cd98d99819f23a4a08e5e17ee1f13f6e4d.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
2e4b8d4f58ea45e55c87ba5563b0d0e135cac2b4
diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/sis5513.c b/drivers/i
strn_pattern_cmp() and ata_port_detach() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
bd2a708230f4e6d2c706b1e781f6a3a33ca52c3e
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drive
After the APUS removal, some code can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/m68k/amiga/chipram.c |2
drivers/ide/ide-probe.c |8 +--
drivers/isdn/hisax/avm_pci.c|8 ---
drivers/scsi/a2091.c
ide_fix_driveid can now be unexported.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
627c730e21e5010a5bdb1f4f9968cfd5e0b4df2a
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
index 9516883..d3c5672 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
@@
ata_scsi_lpm_get() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
380046f657271be470566bb5c762c1599569bac6
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 93bd36c..c4f0c6c 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-
LILO version 16 was released on 26-02-1995 (sic), so telling people to
not use older versions no longer has any value.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
b79ad8a00e9bc0008b42eafd5863d758109d0594
diff --git a/drivers/ide/Kconfig b/drivers/ide/Kconfig
index d1e8df1..e
This patch removes the following obsolete functions:
- libata-core.c: __sata_phy_reset()
- libata-core.c: sata_phy_reset()
- libata-eh.c: ata_qc_timeout()
- libata-eh.c: ata_eng_timeout()
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any ot
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:25:51AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On 3/19/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Subject: ThinkPad doesn't resume from suspend to RAM
> >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/27/80
> > http://lkml.org/lkml
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:23:10PM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:32:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > Subject: kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller
> > (ACPI/IRQ related)
> > References : https://b
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any ot
tatic.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c.old 2007-03-31
21:06:19.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm3/drivers/ata/pata_ali.c 2007-03-31 21:06:33.0
+0200
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
* Inherited from caller.
*/
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
[ Cc's added, additional information is in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/15/32 ]
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:49:29PM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Brad Campbell wrote:
> >G'day all,
> >
> >All I have is a digital photo of this oops. (It's 3.5mb). I have serial
> >console configured, but Murphy is wa
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
[ Cc's added, full bug report was in http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/16/18 ]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:38:22AM -0700, Mike Mattie wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:48:46 -0700
> Mike Mattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am testing the 2.6.21-rc7 kernel release. The IDE hpt366 driv
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:19:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> - Added an i386 early-startup development tree, as git-newsetup.patch ("H.
> Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>...
> Changes since 2.6.21-mm2:
>...
> git-newsetup.patch
>...
> git trees
>...
This breaks the compilation of
This patch makes 3 needlessly global functions static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ata/sata_nv.c |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c.old 2007-06-13
00:02:18.0
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
