On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:50:11 +0800
Albert Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Williams wrote:
Hello,
I just tried the libata support for PATA in kernel 2.6.20-rc5 and I got
this:
scsi1 : pata_sis
ata2.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66
ata2.01: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata2.00: configured for
Tejun fixed the problem by ATA_FLAG_SETXFER_POLLING for pata_via.
Maybe the same fix works for pata_sis.
Could you please try the attached patch, thanks.
I wonder what is really going on here. drivers/ide has some slightly
different handling and notes about problems with some drives. The
Hello,
I just tried the libata support for PATA in kernel 2.6.20-rc5 and I got
this:
scsi1 : pata_sis
ata2.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66
ata2.01: ATAPI, max UDMA/33
ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
ata2.01: qc timeout (cmd 0xef)
ata2.01: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4)
ata2.01: limiting speed to