Hello Boris, Bart,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Borislav Petkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:57:06PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
... it would suggest the option 'hda=noprobe' was entered correctly?
ok, let's try something else: change the line #if 0 to #if 1 at
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:32:41PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
Hi Brad,
Hello Boris, Bart,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Borislav Petkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:57:06PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
... it would suggest the option 'hda=noprobe' was entered
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:57:06PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
Hi Boris,
Well, this sounds strange. Are you sure you're entering the boot options
correctly on the kernel command line? Which is your boot loader? I just
booted
my machine with 'hdc=noprobe' (hdc is my cdrom drive) and
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:38:34PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
[ Added Bart to CC: ]
Hi Brad,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
Feb 14 00:18:18 kernel: hde: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused
(ireason = 0x01).
Trying to recover by ending request.
Feb 14 00:27:27 kernel: hdc:
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:38:34PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
[...]
kernel: hda: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason =
0x01). Trying to recover by ending request.
last message repeated 3 times
kernel: ide: failed opcode
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Borislav Petkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:38:34PM +1000, Brad Rosser wrote:
There's nothing in the bios that allows me to move one away from
the other. I can 'reserve' or block IRQs, but that only shifts them
both to another
Hi Boris,
Well, this sounds strange. Are you sure you're entering the boot options
correctly on the kernel command line? Which is your boot loader? I just
booted
my machine with 'hdc=noprobe' (hdc is my cdrom drive) and here's what i get:
...
[0.304774] Probing IDE interface
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:42:58PM +0100, Boris Petkov wrote:
On 2/14/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:37:50AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
[Added Bart to CC]
Am Dienstag,
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:37:50AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
[Added Bart to CC]
Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I suffer
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:37:50AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
[Added Bart to CC]
Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I suffer
On 2/14/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:37:50AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
[Added Bart to CC]
Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at
Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I suffer from unreliable cdrom operations (failing DAE and burn
sessions) with the openSUSE 2.6.18.8-0.7-bigsmp kernel.
Hi,
can
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:37:50AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
[Added Bart to CC]
Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I suffer from unreliable cdrom operations (failing DAE and burn
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I suffer from unreliable cdrom operations (failing DAE and burn sessions)
with the openSUSE 2.6.18.8-0.7-bigsmp kernel.
Hi,
can please you test this with a more recent kernel. Yours is
14 matches
Mail list logo
