Re: ops->qc_defer not invoked on ata_exec_internal_sg() paths ?

2008-02-26 Thread Mark Lord
Alan Cox wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:20:59 -0500 Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The optional .qc_defer() methods don't seem to be called on the ata_exec_internal_sg() path. At present, this is probably okay. But in the future, as we add functionality for link power management and hotp

Re: ops->qc_defer not invoked on ata_exec_internal_sg() paths ?

2008-02-26 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:20:59 -0500 Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The optional .qc_defer() methods don't seem to be called > on the ata_exec_internal_sg() path. > > At present, this is probably okay. But in the future, > as we add functionality for link power management > and hotplug pol

Re: ops->qc_defer not invoked on ata_exec_internal_sg() paths ?

2008-02-25 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Mark. Mark Lord wrote: > The optional .qc_defer() methods don't seem to be called > on the ata_exec_internal_sg() path. > > At present, this is probably okay. But in the future, > as we add functionality for link power management > and hotplug polling, this could be a problem. > > I thin

ops->qc_defer not invoked on ata_exec_internal_sg() paths ?

2008-02-25 Thread Mark Lord
The optional .qc_defer() methods don't seem to be called on the ata_exec_internal_sg() path. At present, this is probably okay. But in the future, as we add functionality for link power management and hotplug polling, this could be a problem. I think. Or is it possibly also a problem today for