> I'm trying to use the third option - RSA authentication with the
> authorized_keys file.
> however it does not seems to work.
>
> Any idea why ?
1) Check /etc/ssh/sshd_config (or wherever it is located
on your machine) and make sure RSA authentication IS allowed.
2) Read /var/log/messages sho
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> 1. It's not Nagle
what do you base this claim on?
> 2. Keren is right - Mostly.
keren (or rather - guy) is right - fully. what you implemented below is a
workaround that probably suited your specific requirements specifically.
however, more comment
At least in my installation, you would need only:
; Options for handling file name case sensitivity and / or preservation
; Case Sensitivity breaks many WfW and Win95 apps
; case sensitive = yes
short preserve case = yes
preserve case = yes
I would also suggest that you check which fil
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at Google and some samba newsgroup and I cannot fina a
> solution to a small problem..
>
> I have a Linux machine here running samba and its connected to windows
> machine here - connection and everything works - but for some strange
> reason -
Hi,
I'm looking at Google and some samba newsgroup and I cannot fina a
solution to a small problem..
I have a Linux machine here running samba and its connected to windows
machine here - connection and everything works - but for some strange
reason - when I rename a file or copy a file on the sa
You can set up your system so that when a particular student logs onto the
system, first it runs fetchmail to get the mail from the remote system and
depoits it into the local system's user mailbox, and the starts pine.You can
also write a script which would give the student the choise if he want
I have a school where we are only interested in providing the students with
email access on the premises. But we do want to give them the ability to
access their email from the web or through pop off our site.
We have a mail server that is based in the USA which is only accessible
through the in
> Now I see that 3.52 is out, but I don't see how I can get from 3.1 to
> 3.52. I see that I can get from 3.1 to 3.3, but how about from 3.3 to
> 3.52 ?
The latest upgradable version is 3.3. 3.5.x is OEM-only right now, and only
comes with new devices.
> >> Second, has anyone installed it,
> The solution is quite simple: Have the Java client do a (blocking) read (of say, one
>byte) on the socket after sending
> the header. Have the server sent a single "sync" byte to the client immediately
>after opening the log file. And all
> works just fine.
Bear in mind that this solution has
so just get the fourth (fifth, actualy) of Stevens: Unix socket programing
.
Dani
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> 1. It's not Nagle
>
> 2. Keren is right - Mostly. I did take care to have my client flush its output
>buffer after each write, so the server
> should have picked the sa
1. It's not Nagle
2. Keren is right - Mostly. I did take care to have my client flush its output buffer
after each write, so the server
should have picked the same number of reads. After sending off my original query, I
went for a long walk, and hit on the
answer, which I just finished implemen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Yaron Zabary wrote:
> > 1. Why does TCP aggregate the first few records, and then "settle
> > down" and behave as expected?
>
> Probably Nagle (take a look at RFC 896 'the small packet problem'). Try
> to disable Nagle on the senders (not sure this is possible).
disabling NA
12 matches
Mail list logo
