Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not offended by Oleg's, or anyone else's for that matter,
> comments. I just got feedback saying that my responses are quick,
> but shallow, and wanted to explain why. This view I have of the
> purpose of this list may also be wrong.
Sorry Shach
Yes, I have this one terrible drawback - I tend to tell people who seek help where
they can get help, instead of actually doing all their work for them (thus
increasing the chances they will require help again).
I hold it as a poll to the community whether specifying exact command lines is
prefab
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Shapira Home Mail wrote:
> Having trouble with my redhat 6.2 (after upgrading my windows to ME).
> Is it a good idea to install redhat 7??
a better idea would be to try solving your problem - it is most likely
just a booting problem, and this could occure every tme you ins
Hi,
I have tried to backup with dump to a tape drive model
HP-C1537A(dds2,dds3)
on (symbios scsi - ncr53c8xx) on linux box(version 6 - kernel
2.2.12-20).
Yes, the OS recognize the tape and load the "st" module(scsi id 2).
when i type : mt -f /dev/nst0 stat (ofcourse when i put DDS3 media)
SCSI
Hi,
Having trouble with my redhat 6.2 (after upgrading
my windows to ME).
Is it a good idea to install redhat 7?? is it
avalible for download on israeli ftps??
Menachem Shapira
Hi
Few things to check:
1. Does windows start if you boot from the SCSI disk (e.g. by
disconnecting the IDE drive)?
2. If you boot DOS from a diskette, does it see the windows disk? as
what drive? and what number does it get under DOS's fdisk?
3. I have windows installed on a primary-slave, with
Herouth Maoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gavrie Philipson wrote:
> >
> > Subba Rao wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a directory of 1+ text files and would like to search for
> > > some strings in these files. When I tried using "grep" command with an
> > > asterisk, I get the error message somthi
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anybody bothers updating the source zoneinfo from libc (At least on my
> Mandrake it is part of the glibc package)?
So it is on RH6.2
--
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"... We work by wit, and not by witchcraft;
And wit depends on dilatory ti
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, Shaul Karl wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> Then xargs won't work either, will it?
It will work, because xargs can run the command several times, each time giving
it only part of the arguments.
See 'man xargs' (or, read the source if you prefer ;))
Some relevant quotes
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Then xargs won't work either, will it?
it might have - it'll have no problem reading the input (as it comes from
stdin) - but will not be able to exec the command with all argumentsat
once. however, it appears that GNU's xargs supports command-line opti
Hi
I felt this was missing in the FAQ, but I really didn't feel like reading
too many docs, so I wrote:
http://www.iglu.org.il/faq/cache/116.html
The information there is a bit partial, and maybe slightly
incorrect. Anybody wishes to correct this?
And while we're at it:
Anybody bothers updating
I didn't quite understand what you mean by "manually done".
We tried configuring LILO with the yast tool which comes with
SUSE, but it just screwed everything up, and we had to use the backup file
we created.
Manor Gelber wrote:
was
this manually done?he should try
confinguring lilo using lilocon
The lilo doens't seem to do any problem when I run it.
And, yes, I tried the manuals.
Shaul Karl wrote:
1) What output are you getting when you run lilo?
2) Perhaps lilo docs can help you more?
Name: 31
31
Then xargs won't work either, will it?
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> > Short explanation regarding the use of wildcards in Unix commands:
> >..
> > The reason for that is precisely so that you can use this shell feature to
> > perform wildcard expa
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, guy keren wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> be carefull not to trust manual pages too much - they are too often not
> updated. only checking the soruce program of the specific version of
> program you're currently using is usefull for drawing out definitive
> conclusions (
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, guy keren wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> lets read the source more ;) and btw, this does not mean there is no
> limit also imposed in the shell (i.e. it might check for its own limit
> before invoking the libc function that will then invoke the xecve system
> call - an
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> BTW, about this being the old Redhat CD - at least the new one is only a
> week old...
new what? isn't 7.0 still in beta? and even if it is not - past experience
shows it is not a terribly good idea to use *.0 versions of redhat linux
(althought 6.0 wa
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> By the way, it brings up another point I forgot to mention: the limit on
> the command line includes the size of the environment (i.e., a string
> containing all the exported shell variables), because this environment string
> is also passed to the call
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> By the way, 128K (if this is indeed the limit on Linux) is actually a big
> limit.
this is indeed the limit. more exactly, it is 131068 bytes (128K - 4
bytes). the limit is for both command line arguments and the
environment. this is for linux on x86.
--Boundary_(ID_fQwNzHePtdRawwXARu1gbw)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
1) Workaround: After letting your recipints know you can split the file and
e-mail it in pieces.
2) Cancel the limitation: the admin of your site can do that for you. But I do
not
1) What output are you getting when you run lilo?
2) Perhaps lilo docs can help you more?
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
-- File: 31
-- Desc: 31
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon Sep 25 23:37:25 2000
Envelope-to: shaul@localhost
Received: from localhost ([1
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, To Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> command line. This kernel call has a limit - I don't know what it is in Linux,
> but from a little experiment I guess it is 128 kilobytes. If the
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Limits of grep?":
> Short explanation regarding the use of wildcards in Unix commands:
>..
> The reason for that is precisely so that you can use this shell feature to
> perform wildcard expansion.
>
> The down side of this is that the limit
Gavrie Philipson wrote:
>
> Subba Rao wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a directory of 1+ text files and would like to search for
> > some strings in these files. When I tried using "grep" command with an
> > asterisk, I get the error message somthing to the effect,
> >
> > "File argum
Subba Rao wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a directory of 1+ text files and would like to search for
> some strings in these files. When I tried using "grep" command with an
> asterisk, I get the error message somthing to the effect,
>
> "File argument list too long"
>
Besides Shachar's a
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I suggest using xargs with such a large number of files. Assume you're in
the directory with those 1+ files:
find . -name "*"|xargs grep -s -l pattern
This will return a list of files that include the pattern, and will
supress unwanted errors. T
Short explanation regarding the use of wildcards in Unix commands:
Unlike what you may or may not know from Dos, the one responsible for the
wildcard expansion is not the command itself - you will not find in grep
instructions regarding what to do with filenames having asterixes. Instead, it
is t
Hi
I have a directory of 1+ text files and would like to search for
some strings in these files. When I tried using "grep" command with an
asterisk, I get the error message somthing to the effect,
"File argument list too long"
What is the file argument limit for grep? I guess you ne
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000, Lior Krochmal wrote about "FREE REDHAT 6.2 CD":
> Yo Yo Yo PPL!!!
> i guess you all allready know about the Comdex in "Ganei Ata'arucha" In Tel-Aviv at
>the 27/09/00 . there will be the "Linux Day" - our day .
> this is something for sure :
> there gonna be a HUGE ping
Hi
I'm not too much up-to-date with the recent developments in gtk, and I
don't live by the CVS, and don't follow those lists. Still a search check
of the gnome lists archives yields the following, from:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2000-August/msg00481.html
The unstable v
Hi & Thanks for answering
When i wrote "CURRENTLY" i meant the mail is already in the /var/spool/mail as
a file.
I know how to forward coming mail.
Mike Almogy wrote:
> put in his/her user dir file called :
>
> forward
> there you will write the user other mail address
>
> Mike
>
> - Origin
Hello
I'm trying to send e-mail, that it's
size is about 5MB
And I get it back because of size
limitation.
How to cancel the limitation of size sending
mail at mail server ?
Thanks
Hagit
32 matches
Mail list logo