Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the naming of kernel sources and I'd like some help
before I screw something up. I want to compile 2.4.20 instead of the existing
2.4.19-16mdk on my MDK 9.0. I don't usually run after the **latest** kernel,
but in this case, I still haven't been able to get my TV
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, shlomo solomon wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the naming of kernel sources and I'd like some help
before I screw something up. I want to compile 2.4.20 instead of the existing
2.4.19-16mdk on my MDK 9.0. I don't usually run after the **latest** kernel,
but in this
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, shlomo solomon wrote:
kernel-linus2.4-2.4.20-1mdk.src.rpm
This is an unpatched kernel tree . So it won't have the supermount patch
BTW - I also found kernel-source-2.4.21-pre2.1mdk.i586.rpm and it's 34
mega
Hi,
The reason for the change of size in:
27440693 Jan 10 09:10 kernel-linus2.4-2.4.20-1mdk.src.rpm
33963814 Jan 9 20:17 linux-2.4.20.tar.gz
Is because this RPM has .bz2 in them and not tar.gz, and since .bz2
compresses better than gzip , that why you have the difference in sizes.
Besides that
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:32:01 +0200, shlomo solomon wrote
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the naming of kernel sources and I'd like
some help before I screw something up. I want to compile 2.4.20
instead of the existing
Which TV card do you have? are you absolutly sure it's not inside the
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:15, Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
Which TV card do you have? are you absolutly sure it's not inside the
Mandrake kernel?
I have a FlyVideo2000 - saa7130 chip (not bt848). There is a module in the MDK
9.0 kernel, but it's not working for me. I wrote a few days ago to the
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:32:01 +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
kernel-linus2.4-2.4.20-1mdk.src.rpm
Aside from the strange name (why is Linus' name in the kernel name?),
Because this is how the Mandrake folks name the packages containing an
unpatched verisons of the kernel. The kernels patched by
shlomo solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the naming of kernel sources and I'd like some help
before I screw something up. I want to compile 2.4.20 instead of the existing
2.4.19-16mdk on my MDK 9.0. I don't usually run after the **latest** kernel,
but in
To whomever wanted the 2.4.20 version of mandrake's kernel
you might want to try the rpms for the new 9.1beta1.
btw it also has kde3.1rc6 and gnome 2.2 pre
much like redhat 8.1beta.
I just hope they copyed the font installer from redhat.
gnome 2.2 greatly improve the support for hebrew in widgets
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about Re: mandrake and kernel:
BTW: the new NPTL from Red Hat (on this beta) is really cool... (but it sucks
that you cannot change language - you change once, you cannot change back...
grrr...)
Ah?
NPTL is the new Native POSIX Thread Library for
Ah?
NPTL is the new Native POSIX Thread Library for Linux. In what sense is
it cool? And what does NPTL have to do with languages???
Someone showed me some performance tests on NPTL compared to standard threads
(I see it also when I compile KDE CVS), the speed is indeed impressive...
It
These animations feature penguins. A lot of penguins. One of them also
has a couple of portraits on the wall that you might recognize. Enjoy.
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/linux/fun/index.html
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is nothing more practical than idealism.
[Richard
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:45:29PM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, shlomo solomon wrote:
kernel-linus2.4-2.4.20-1mdk.src.rpm
This is an unpatched kernel tree . So it won't have the supermount patch
BTW - I
Oleg, I sort of scanned your E-mail. And I agree the GNU project
originated with many tools that have made Linux possible. In fact, most of
the basic components are part of the GNU project. But still not all.
Furthermore, GNU is a collective name for a lot of individuals. Stallman
itself did not
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:52:26PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Oleg, I sort of scanned your E-mail. And I agree the GNU project
originated with many tools that have made Linux possible. In fact, most of
the basic components are part of the GNU project. But still not all.
Furthermore, GNU
Free Open Source Developers Europe Meeting, 8th-9th February in Brussels.
http://www.fosdem.org/
Anyone is going?
Gabor @ Israel.pm
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: RMS over Humous - meeting
summery:
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Book libraries existed and nobody thought that paying $10 a year for a
library subscription (when one book costs more than that) was cheating
the
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: RMS over Humous - meeting
summery:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good idea. Nadav, with your permission I would like to put that up
on Hamakor.
Under Nadav's name, I hope, not as a part of Hamakor's position.
Right. I
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: RMS over Humous - meeting
summery:
I also agree with some things that RMS says. I do disagree with his
ideas about freedom though on a vary basic level, but I will only
discuss that over some free beer. ;-) On this list it would be
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
preaching for freedom as he does. I hope the new amuta will stress
technical issues rather than ideological ones.
I hope the amuta will replace your rather than with an as well as.
The Amuta's name has free software and open source, right? Let's
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oleg, I sort of scanned your E-mail.
Why don't you read it, then? You'll see that I mention original
authors other than RMS, and my real point is that Linux should *not*
be called GNU/Linux, even though to me it sure looks like GNU is a big
part of it. Oh,
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Sat, 11 Jan:
I don't know what your basic disagreements are (I guess I'll have to buy
you a beer to find out :))
I think Oleg has put it very clearly in a post here, he's against the
basic ideals of freedom, and therefore the fact that they are
objectively
22 matches
Mail list logo
