On 19/04/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Few years ago, while (and still) administrating the Israeli Radio Amature
Commette (IARC) server, which is a Linux machine, and back then it was old
[snip]
rm -Rf home
AAARG! NOW I know what happened to my f-ing files on that
Quoting Dan Kenigsberg, from the post of Tue, 19 Apr:
Dear List,
I wonder if anyone heard of a similar problem. Somewhere there exist two IBM
desktop machines, model 8189-7cg to be exact, running RedHat 9 (2.4.20 kernel)
and Fedora Core 1 (2.4.22-1.2197 kernel). Once in a not-too-long while,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:41:06AM +0300, Arik Baratz wrote:
AAARG! NOW I know what happened to my f-ing files on that server!
Your backups were NOT up to date enough!!!
*ROTFL*
EZ, you win :-)
Cheers,
Muli
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Just to clarify my last mail: the problems I mentioned are inherent to
(Open)MOSIX. Our IT staff did a lot of work configuring and optimizing
the system and fixed all that could be fixed (I know because I also
looked at some of these problems myself), but it boils down to
fundamental
Hi,
Another clarification to my cluster of e-mails about clusters:
The OpenMOSIX at Weizmann *does* work very well for applications that
were specifically rewritten with MOSIX in mind, such as custom
scientific computation C programs written by the institute's
researchers, and even some Matlab
On 4/20/05, Eran Tromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OpenMOSIX at Weizmann *does* work very well for applications that
were specifically rewritten with MOSIX in mind, such as custom
scientific computation C programs written by the institute's
researchers, and even some Matlab programs (if
Gosh, it is a small world.
(Or should I say, a small Linux community?)
It is amazing what happens to service calls. I looked up at your posted message
and saw something about emacs in mail mode. I have NO idea how come this piece
of information was generated. The Technion guy with these problems
Hi Everyone
im going to get a new IBM / DELL rackable server.
I thought of using software raid and save the expenses of Hardware one.
The raid is going to be a simple mirror raid of two SCSI HD.
I heard that the performance deference between the Hardware solution to
the software one is
--=-xeMgqremlNSKwXUf6JLO
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 18:13 +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
Is it possible to Hot Swap the faulty HD in the software solution ? the
IBM spec say the bay scsi adapter support hotswap.
How reliable and easy to
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Eran Tromer wrote:
So if you expect it to be magic supercomputer you'll end up
disappointed; as Gilad said, if you have well-characterized and
MOSIX-friendly workload, great. Otherwise, don't expect great success.
I also considered installing MOSIX for some time, and
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 05:43:14 -0700
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David D [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[this is my second attempt. The first one didn't make
it to the list]
OK, I know how to google, and I have read several
documents, but almost all of them talk about
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:26:23 +0300
Eran Tromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 19/04/05 21:13, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
MOSIX/OpenMOSIX is a great
academic excersize - a working academic excersize, but not something I
would use except for very specific and narrow taks in controled
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:09:18 +0300
Michael Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/20/05, Eran Tromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OpenMOSIX at Weizmann *does* work very well for applications that
were specifically rewritten with MOSIX in mind, such as custom
scientific computation C
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:07:28AM +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Hi list,
I'm looking for a free software tool for solving a specific OCR task
(details below).
I've googled up several projects, but because of time limits I'll not be
able to give them a fair try.
If you have some
On 4/20/05, Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW there is a way to allow matlab to migrate over openmosix (and
probably mosix) although you need to disable the gui interface (JAVA) using
the
- nojvm flag (it can still open image windows) and disable the licence manager
heartbeat
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:45:36PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
You may also want to have a look at www.kerrighed.org/
OpenSSI (http://openssi.org/) is also worth watching. Of all of the
SSI projects, it's the only one that appears to stand a non-negligible
chance of mainline kernel inclusion -
Orna Agmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the advanced OS course in HaifaU Oleg Goldshmidt showed benchmark
results, which show that migration does not enlarge the ability of the
cluster to deal with loads in a significant manner. Back filling, on the
other hand, does.
Ahem... ;-) I would not
Thanks alot for the reply.
I'll try having a look at both tools.
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
Description:
---
We have a large database of scans consisting of numerical data, which
need to be accurately converted to text, with minimal human intervention.
The scans are low quality
I'll second that.
Have just started deploying OpenSSI for our researchers and it looks
very promising (mainly for high volume image processing).
Couple of useful links:
http://www.gelato.org/pdf/Illinois/gelato_IL2004_openssi_walker.pdf
This one in Hebrew:
Shahar,
Your update is not sufficient. The data from HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft
\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Time Zones\Israel Standard Time is read ONLY
when the client *switches* the timezone. When updating you also need to
write to HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\TimeZoneInformation
directly.
Guy Teverovsky wrote:
Shahar,
Your update is not sufficient. The data from HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft
\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Time Zones\Israel Standard Time is read ONLY
when the client *switches* the timezone. When updating you also need to
write to
It is incomplete on purpose:
1. You cannot change the setting while explorer is up. Changing the
registry directly like that creates inconsistency between the running
configuration and the stored configuration, resulting in confusion or worse.
We successfully updated several hundred hosts
Guy Teverovsky wrote:
It's not about who's solution is better.
This is just an FYI that you might run into issues with your current solution.
Adding instruction to switch TZ back and forth after merging the reg
would save you some grief.
It wasn't done for personal consumption, but thanks
23 matches
Mail list logo
