On 8/17/05, Ilia K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I very want, that this girl will stay with linux, but internet
connection seems to be the bottle neck. I'll appreciate any
feedback, especially helpful one :)
PPTP is set up by executing:
[...snip...]
I don't know a thing about routing, instead
Hi,
One year ago in my previous apartment I had connection problems to the cables.
After lot of misery I have found that the problem had consisted of two elements:
1. The cable connection is not very stable. In their underlying
protocol they lose many packets, resulting sometimes in losing *your*
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, guy keren wrote:
the process is not reversible, because 'linking' is not a reversible
function - it only takes part of the objects and places them in the
binary (especially if we're talking about objects taken from static
libraries).
also, (here i am half-guessing)
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:59:26AM +0300, Efraim Yawitz wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, guy keren wrote:
the process is not reversible, because 'linking' is not a reversible
function - it only takes part of the objects and places them in the
binary (especially if we're talking about
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 23:18, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Someone mentioned a program like wget that opened multiple connections
when discussing their multiple connection routing programs. I thought
I had saved their email and a web search has come up with nothing.
Obviously I don't
Hi,
My workplace desktop is Debian testing, I try to keep it
up to date.
Last week or so gcc 4.0.1 and friends (g++, cpp etc) turned up
and wanted to replace good old 3.x.
I wonder if anyone has experience with these packages - are
they reliable? Do they produce good code? Should I upgrade?
I
It really depends if you care about binary compatibility for your
binaries. (specially if you spread binaries).
I belive that people who use Fedora Core 4 could tell you about their
experience with GCC 4 (I'm using QEMU and GCC 4 cannot compile it).
Thanks,
Hetz
On 8/18/05, Amos Shapira [EMAIL
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 15:01, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shlomi Fish wrote:
I've checked it on the desktop machine with both Win98 and Mandriva
2006 LE Linux - both exhibited the problem. I tried disabling all
listening ports and other downloads on Linux - it didn't
Amos Shapira wrote:
Hi,
My workplace desktop is Debian testing, I try to keep it
up to date.
Last week or so gcc 4.0.1 and friends (g++, cpp etc) turned up
and wanted to replace good old 3.x.
I wonder if anyone has experience with these packages - are
they reliable? Do they produce good
On 8/18/05, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will find that some programs that compiled with earlier gccs do not
compile any more. The fixes are simple, but if you don't care about gcc
4, you probably don't want the mess, however small it is.
OK, I'll wait with this then.
You can
I'm using GCC 4.01 on both FC4/i386 and FC4/x86-64.
Seems to be working just fine.
I had some problems debugging libraries under gdb when libraries were
compiled against gcc 4.0. But I've yet to try gdb with gcc 4.01.
Gilboa
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:27 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
Hi,
My
Amos Shapira wrote:
On 8/18/05, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can always use alternatives to keep gcc 3.3 as your default.
That's actually the original source of my question - aptitude lists gcc
4 as REPLACING the current gcc 3.x, not as coming in addition to it,
(possibly
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Then again, it may be a faulty NIC, like Baruch
pointer out.
OK. I've already switched from one Ethernet card to the other here, because
the previous one stopped functioning. Is it possible that my computer
serially damages the Etherenet cards it is
Use SCHED_FIFO and it will work.
Peter
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey this is exactly my problem, I called the cable company and they couldn't
help
so I suffer from my connection getting bumped a number of times a day.
so how do I change the LCP configuration?
I am using debian sarge.
Thanks
Aaron
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:21:22AM +0300 or thereabouts,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Rafi Gordon wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to create a delay of 1 microsec in a user space
applcation in 2.4
or 2.6 kernel?
If you really meant 1 microsecond (as opposed to 1 millisecond) then the
answer is to do a busy wait loop forthe
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Rafi Gordon wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to create a delay of 1 microsec in a user space
applcation in 2.4
or 2.6 kernel?
What you want is posix high resolution timers kernel patch.
http://high-res-timers.sf.net
--
Matan Ziv-Av. [EMAIL
On 8/18/05, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amos Shapira wrote:
On 8/18/05, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can always use alternatives to keep gcc 3.3 as your default.
That's actually the original source of my question - aptitude lists gcc
4 as REPLACING the current gcc
On 8/19/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually, it _looks_ like gettimeofday() sometimes takes less then a
micro-second to execute. i tested it a few years ago on redhat 7.3, on a
pentium 1.8MHz and an AMD athlon 2200+, and on both of them running
gettimeofday in a tight loop very
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:09:57AM +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
I'm not sure this is a correct way to measure - gettimeofday(2)'s *interface
definition* is to count nanoseconds, but that doesn't mean that the system's
clock can measure at this resolution.
Don't forget that clock interupts are
On 8/18/05, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I've already switched from one Ethernet card to the other here, because
the previous one stopped functioning. Is it possible that my computer
serially damages the Etherenet cards it is using? :-(
Also try to replace the cable itself.
--Amos
On 8/19/05, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the grounding of your computer case and of the modem. I have seen
cable installations that would input 5Vac into the cable ground from
ground fault currents plus scary glitch voltages when A/C was switched
on and off.
I dunno where you live but
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 8/19/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually, it _looks_ like gettimeofday() sometimes takes less then a
micro-second to execute. i tested it a few years ago on redhat 7.3, on a
pentium 1.8MHz and an AMD athlon 2200+, and on both ofthem
Peter wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Shaul Karl wrote:
method. Which reminds me: how come using cables has to do with
authentication to the ISP mail server?
All the people in a cable segment are in the same 'pool' and they
could masquerade as each other afaik. Not running a firewall on
Peter wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Shaul Karl wrote:
method. Which reminds me: how come using cables has to do with
authentication to the ISP mail server?
All the people in a cable segment are in the same 'pool' and they
could masquerade as each other afaik. Not running a firewall on
Hi!
On 8/18/05, Noam Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
One year ago in my previous apartment I had connection problems to the
cables.
After lot of misery I have found that the problem had consisted of two
elements:
1. The cable connection is not very stable. In their underlying
Hi All again!
Thanks to all guys, who have replied me!
However, nobody have told me yet, whether I've missed some point in
the configuration.
I want to emphasize the fact, that even under very low load (one ssh
connection only), _half_ of pings are lost when pinging the PPTP
server or some public
Ready yourself for a long process.
The first, second and maybe third guys are usually contract techies who
usually replace your modem or check wall connections and maybe change in
house
cables. Only after they can't solve your problem the expert guy will
come
to check your stairs and building
On 8/19/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 8/19/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually, it _looks_ like gettimeofday() sometimes takes less then a
micro-second to execute. i tested it a few years ago on redhat 7.3, on a
29 matches
Mail list logo
