Ira Abramov wrote:
This is not exactly a GPL violation,
I'm not sure you are right about this.
Here's my take on things. The kernel is GPL, which means that all
derived work of it needs to be GPL too, or it is infringing on the
kernel's copyright.
There are three approaches to understanding
How does checkpoint qualify in this matter.
They sale the splat that is redhat linux. Did anyone requested or got
their sources for the splat CD?
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Ira Abramov wrote:
This is not exactly a GPL violation,
I'm not sure you are right about this.
Here's my take on things.
Meir Michanie wrote:
How does checkpoint qualify in this matter.
this matter relates to binary kernel modules. As far as I know, it's
just another binary kernel module. I am not aware that they are using
any GPL only exports (though I really don't know).
They sale the splat that is redhat
Can someone point me to some web pages that will explain
how smoke and regression testing of the Linux kernel is handled?
Is there an aggregator of the smoke test results one could see?
I looked at http://www.osdl.org/ but could not locate this information.
I looked at
After an Ubuntu upgrade I get
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
So what now ?
Gabor
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body,
