Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Thu, 30 Nov:
All Hypothetical...
well, it was a little white lie, if you didn't suspect :-)
After double checking my legal status in any case, it turns out I am not
under NDA at the time of this writing, but will be by the end of the
day, so I'll say this
Sendsms is still alive and kicking - but only with the Orange site.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Wait, that script is working again...? It stopped working 2 years ago!
--
Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ 162180901
Hello everybody.
Is it any way to attach a verion number to executable file ? In Windows
right click - properties - Version style ? Maybe as output of file
command ? Of course I always can implement -v or --version switch to
my executable, but do we have something more standard ?
Hi Michael,
There is no way to attach any properties to any file in Raiserfs, ext3
and most of the other file systems in common use in Linux. But you can
embed the version designator in the file assuming that you build it using
a compiler.
Define a static string like
String Version = Version
Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Thu, 30 Nov:
All Hypothetical...
well, it was a little white lie, if you didn't suspect :-)
After double checking my legal status in any case, it turns out I am not
under NDA at the time of this writing, but will be by the
Hi,
What is the encoding of the Hebrew text file ?
On my vimrc (I do not use gvimrc) I made the following statement:
set fileencodings=utf-8,ucs-bom,iso-8859-8-i,iso-8859-8,iso-8859-1
Please note that if your text file does not contain BOM (
Byte Order Mark)
Vim (and any other text editor)
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:26:46 +0200
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They manage 1 and 2, they have a very good case for claiming that the
userspace tool is not a derived work of their kernel space driver, and
thus not bound by the kernel module's license.
Shachar
This goes into
What about:
attr - For the XFS filesystem
setfattr / getfattr - For other file systems
---
Chaim
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 13:06, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
Hi Michael,
There is no way to attach any properties to any file in Raiserfs, ext3
and most of the other file systems in common use
Usual disclaimers apply. I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice.
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:26:46 +0200
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They manage 1 and 2, they have a very good case for claiming that the
userspace tool is not a derived work of their kernel
Michael Sternberg wrote:
Hello everybody.
Is it any way to attach a verion number to executable file ? In
Windows right click - properties - Version style ? Maybe as output
of file command ? Of course I always can implement -v or
--version switch to my executable, but do we have something
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
To my thinking - yes. If you create an interface that is independent of
the implementation, no-one using that interface can be said to be
derived work of the implementation.
Yes, that does mean that the GPL isn't as strong as we may hope/wish it
to
Peter wrote:
It's nice to see that you are as polite as ever. Always refreshing to
see someone who spends so much time in understanding what others say,
and effort in making his objections so elegantly and tactfully heard.
The intention is clear:
It is indeed.
So I think that your thinking is
Here is a nice article on the use of setfattr / getfattr
http://enterprise.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/06/13/1352241tid=113tid=70tid=89
But, as Shachar says, it will not survive packaging or archiving.
Chaim
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:42, Michael Sternberg wrote:
Hello everybody.
Is
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:48:11PM +0200, ik wrote:
Hi,
What is the encoding of the Hebrew text file ?
On my vimrc (I do not use gvimrc) I made the following statement:
set fileencodings=utf-8,ucs-bom,iso-8859-8-i,iso-8859-8,iso-8859-1
Please note that if your text file does not contain
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I offered instead that they write a GPL module that allows access to
what they need in the kernel through IOCTLs and move their binary-only
blob to userspace. This was acceptable to them and I believe it's the
correct legal solution myself (correct me if I'm wrong)
No Pelephone? No Cellcum? No ICQ? No backfall to Asterisk...?
ביום רביעי 13 דצמבר 2006, 11:45, נכתב על ידי Dan Kenigsberg:
Sendsms is still alive and kicking - but only with the Orange site.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Wait, that script is working
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
So much as Linus can speak for the entire gang of kernel copyright
holders (and probably even if not because of estopel)
Isn't estopel only relevant once you tried to trial such claim and fail?
I doubt any such thing has happened (i.e. - a kernel developer trying to
sue
The purpose of a license is to prevent the visit to a judge. Therefore
most of the discussions around licenses elaborated by comitee revolve
around what a judge *would* do and not around what he will do.
Because the chances to win a lawsuit are directly related to the depth
of the parties
Sorry, sent this privately by mistake, linux-il doesn't work with the reply to
list option of sylpheed ...
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:52:50 +0200
From: Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ethical question..
On Wed, 13 Dec
If you DO NOT write plain vanilla C code to Posix libc specs and expect
to fully use the advanced features offered by GPL-ONLY licensed
extensions to libraries, and distribute binary that links against these,
then you are in trouble even if there are 24 different implementations
of said
On Wednesday, 13 בDecember 2006 11:30, Ira Abramov wrote:
the company in question (and those of you who know who they are, know),
Has promissed me to solve the issue. the problem was a proprietary
kernel module that should have tainted the kernel and recieved a
restricted set of symbols, but
On Wednesday, 13 בDecember 2006 21:51, Peter wrote:
Speaking of sheduler, RTLinux took out some patents on just such a
sheduler and restricted RTLinux distribution based on that
This is 'solved' in that the RTLinux code is dual licensed.
You mixed patents with copyrights. RTLinux code
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Micha Feigin wrote:
Question is, is it enough that there is one non-GPL implementation I
can link against exporting the same API, does this now make the work
non-derived of the GPL API?
More to the point, does the API fall under the GPL or the results.
The answer is:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Oron Peled wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 בDecember 2006 21:51, Peter wrote:
Speaking of sheduler, RTLinux took out some patents on just such a
sheduler and restricted RTLinux distribution based on that
This is 'solved' in that the RTLinux code is dual licensed.
You mixed
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:14:48 +0200
Avraham Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:48:11PM +0200, ik wrote:
Hi,
What is the encoding of the Hebrew text file ?
On my vimrc (I do not use gvimrc) I made the following statement:
set
25 matches
Mail list logo
