hello
i have a web page that refreshes all the time to display things from a
mysql database which is updated from time to time.
however. this meens a lot of un-needed acesses to the database. and this
refresshing page may be openede by many browsers. causing a huge load on
the database.
i know
Hi, I think you tackle it wrong.
If there is no need for accessing the database all the time, why not cache
the result in tools such as Memcached or Redis ?
If they are different clients (as in agents), then there are other tools at
your disposal, such as Varnish, that create cached version for
I don't know about triggers, but you could have a caching mechanism
server side, which queries for last update to determine whether a new
page needs to be rendered and serves the cached page.
You could also make sure that the auto refreshes cause only the
relevant queries and not all the queries
In similar line to some of the other suggestions:
1. A cache sounds like a must here.
2. Make the process which updates the database to also clear the cache to
trigger a refresh.
On 17 November 2013 19:18, Erez D erez0...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
i have a web page that refreshes all the time
Thanks Michael,
Appreciate your input. I hope I wasn't understood as advocating: Go,
D.I.Y, replace any battery-cell in any battery pack, with whatever
equipment you may have hanging around your home-garage.
But...
FYI, The best forum dealing with battery repair, is not in Russian, it
maybe
Hi,
The issue I with JEdit I had is probably not related to the fact it is
Java based application.
What I had is that when pressing ctrl-f for search in JEdit , which is a
very frequent operation, the JEdit search box was opened, but the focus was
not on the search box of the search dialog. So I
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:36 AM, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I think you tackle it wrong.
If there is no need for accessing the database all the time, why not cache
the result in tools such as Memcached or Redis ?
then i will still need to poll Memcached or Redis. this may speedup
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Erez D erez0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:36 AM, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I think you tackle it wrong.
If there is no need for accessing the database all the time, why not
cache the result in tools such as Memcached or Redis ?
On 11/17/2013 3:39 PM, Erez D wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:36 AM, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I think you tackle it wrong.
If there is no need
