Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2016-01-28 20:37 GMT+02:00 Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin : > Due to bezeq's modem's wifi unreliability, I'm mostly connecting to my > own wifi router anyway. > I'd have switched to it completely and use a firewall there, except > it's old and doesn't support IPv6 at all, and I haven't gotten around > to

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
Due to bezeq's modem's wifi unreliability, I'm mostly connecting to my own wifi router anyway. I'd have switched to it completely and use a firewall there, except it's old and doesn't support IPv6 at all, and I haven't gotten around to buy a new one and/or install *WRT. I'm also a general believer

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
It is of course highly recommended to figure out a way to use the firewall in the router in IPv6 mode too Changing your setup to local fws only makes you both more vulnerable to attack and the total setup much harder to manage In a worst (or best depends on how you look at it) case scenari

More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 Thread Omer Zak
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 15:55 +0200, Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin wrote: > Brain dump & tips on starting with IPv6 [I imagine Shachar knows all > this but for others, including future me ;-]: A nice brain dump! To complement the brain dump, I'd like to see advice, from anyone who has experience with th

Re: IPv6 tunnels [was: Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael]

2016-01-28 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 26/01/2016 17:04, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > >> Hi all. Do we have one or two?? Want to get rid of NAT (partially). > > Off-topic, but I saw the following error today in my mail log: > > dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host aspmx

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-28 Thread Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin
2016-01-12 19:18 GMT+02:00 Shachar Shemesh : > > Down sides: > You are still going to be using NAT. Since the IPv6 support in Israel is > virtually non-existent, which means you will be using your IPv4 address quite > a lot. You only get one of those. Do you mean still using NAT for IPv4 connect