This was not meant to be a debate about software development, so let me
end this thread by:
1 - thanking all
2 - saying that aside from one "small" point, I agree with all Guy wrote
in his last post about security, curriculum, develpment, etc -
especially about "software developers that insist on
On 5/20/24 09:25, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
On Sun, 19 May 2024 23:17:13 +0300
guy keren wrote:
the fact that traceroute works in this case while your python code
doesn't work in this case, suggests there is some at least one
scenario that your code doesn't handle, even though it could.
On Mon, 20 May 2024 11:24:19 +0300
shimi wrote:
> should have asked: "I don't want to use my ISP, can you recommend a
> shell provider that does not block traceroute?"
>
> -- Shimi
Thanks again.
Good point, except that when I started the thread, that option did not
even occur to me -
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 9:26 AM Shlomo Solomon
wrote:
> Thanks again.
>
> As I wrote earlier in reply to Guy Keren, I know that the Python/Scapy
> code to emulate traceroute does NOT work like the real traceroute, but
> that is the assignment I give to my students based on the curriculum,
> so
Thanks again.
As I wrote earlier in reply to Guy Keren, I know that the Python/Scapy
code to emulate traceroute does NOT work like the real traceroute, but
that is the assignment I give to my students based on the curriculum,
so comparing this code to the real traceroute does not really help in
On Sun, 19 May 2024 23:17:13 +0300
guy keren wrote:
>
> the fact that traceroute works in this case while your python code
> doesn't work in this case, suggests there is some at least one
> scenario that your code doesn't handle, even though it could.
Thank you again.
I agree, but see the
Replying to my own post :-)
As I wrote earlier, I do not want to go to the time and expense of
using a cloud server. That would really be over-kill in this case. But I
discovered a great free service that offers a Linux bash prompt in the
cloud with no need to setup anything. For anyone who is
