Re: CLOSE_WAIT

2002-09-02 Thread LS
Everybody on the Net keeps telling me that they are nessessary. I have a client/server utility, both sides are at my control. It works for some two-three weeks and then computer flooded with CLOSE_WAITS, I can not open more sockets and have to restart application (or reboot computer). I'm using

Re: [OT] Looking for jobs

2002-08-29 Thread LS
Actually he has a point. Consider who's receiving CVs nowadays. It's quite possible an entire office doesn't have Acrobat Reader installed, or at least most of them don't have it.. Just a thought tho Eli PS. On a personal note, I doubt you'll have trouble finding a job with what you know, so

Re: OT: Open Source Image Editor Applet

2002-08-27 Thread LS
Following questions from subscribers, I want to clarify that I asked about APPLET and not APPLICATION. I'm aware that it can't access the client's filesystem, and it is not my intention. The read is done against a URL, and the write is done against the server (e.g. through a POST request). Oh,

Re: OT: Open Source Image Editor Applet

2002-08-27 Thread LS
2Thanks. However, I prefer to do it in a Kosher way. And in any case, even after decompilation, the code is still obfuscated. No problems, just one question: what do you mean by obfuscated ? The only thing missing is comments :-) Eli

Re: select() and write()

2002-07-12 Thread LS
You set a socket fd to nonblocking with: fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK); IMHO this is NOT the right way to set non-blocking IO, you are overwriting any other socket flags. Consider the following code: rc = fcntl( fd, F_GETFL, 0); if ( rc != -1) fcntl( fd, F_SETFL, rc | O_NONBLOCK);