RE: Fw: What's wrong with this code?

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:40 PM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: 'Shachar Shemesh'; Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code? snipped The company I work for currently

RE: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?)

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
To: Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list Cc: Tal, Shachar; 'Shachar Shemesh' Subject: Re: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?) On Tuesday 18 November 2003 04:22, Guy Teverovsky wrote: CVS is not: version control mechanism which is content aware and action driven

RE: Fw: What's wrong with this code?

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
Hi Oleg, -Original Message- From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:28 AM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Shachar Shemesh'; Guy Teverovsky Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code? Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

RE: [OT] OSS lint-type static checker?

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:27 PM To: Tal, Shachar Subject: Re: [OT] OSS lint-type static checker? Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm talking about code that I gets compiled (for production

RE: [OT] OSS lint-type static checker?

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:22 PM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [OT] OSS lint-type static checker? Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Oleg Goldshmidt Of course

RE: Linux/UNIX/ISO VARARGS to MSVC++ ???

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
Google is your friend... Fourth from the top, searching for : variable arguments #define visual C++ http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Programming_Languages/Cplusplus/ Q_20281300.html HTH, Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Noam Rathaus [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Fw: What's wrong with this code?

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:01 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code? Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If I need access to code which I am not privileged

RE: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?)

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
be phrased in many ways, but the point mentioned in the mesasge I'm replying to is, IMHO, talks exactly on that trade off. Your preference might vary. boaz. Tal, Shachar wrote: If only the small integratable single-minded tools were *easily* integratable, I suspect Rational would have

RE: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?)

2003-11-18 Thread Tal, Shachar
PM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: 'Gilad Ben-Yossef'; Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list; 'Shachar Shemesh' Subject: Re: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?) On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote about RE: Version control (was: Re: What's wrong with this code?): If only

[OT] OSS lint-type static checker?

2003-11-16 Thread Tal, Shachar
Hi all, Anyone can recommend or warn against usage of a (preferably Open Source, otherwise customizable) lint-like tool, for static checking of C++ and/or C# code? Thanks, Shachar Tal Verint Systems This electronic message contains information from Verint Systems, which may be privileged and

RE: Fw: What's wrong with this code?

2003-11-16 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 7:51 AM To: Guy Teverovsky Cc: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code? Guy Teverovsky wrote: On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 10:46, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

RE: Fw: What's wrong with this code?

2003-11-16 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:38 AM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: Guy Teverovsky; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: Fw: What's wrong with this code? Tal, Shachar wrote: While agreeing with most of your post, I

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-12 Thread Tal, Shachar
. Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Oleg Goldshmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 5:40 PM To: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? Tal, Shachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW - This just in: MS Virtual PC 2004 (aka

RE: Reiserfs acting up

2003-11-12 Thread Tal, Shachar
Did you try checking for bad blocks using dd if=/dev/hda9 of=/dev/null ? Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:25 AM To: Ez-Aton Cc: Linux-IL Subject: Re: Reiserfs acting up Ez-Aton

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:12 PM To: Shachar Shemesh Cc: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:39:07PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote: I downloaded Fedora,

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
. Shachar. -Original Message- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:17 AM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: Shachar Shemesh; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:12:21AM +0200, Tal, Shachar wrote

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:25 AM To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Cc: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:39:07PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
I said IT. :) The development people are not against Linux (though most prefer Microsoft). Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:55 AM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: 'Muli Ben-Yehuda'; Linux-IL

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:55 AM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: 'Shachar Shemesh'; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:48:49AM +0200, Tal, Shachar wrote: Well

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:30 AM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? Tal, Shachar wrote: I work for a mostly-M$ shop, which happens

RE: EULA on free software?

2003-11-11 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:00 PM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda; Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: EULA on free software? Tal, Shachar wrote: There are several snags in this plan of yours

Redhat 9 slowness - continued

2003-11-09 Thread Tal, Shachar
Actually, my first guess of TLS would not spell security (as in Transport Level Security), but would spell favoring-SMP (as in Thread-Level Storage). I suppose you /lib/tls is optimized for SMP and /lib/i686 for UP. Of course, I could be wrong, as this is written way too early in the morning.

RE: GNU/Linux Compatible Initiative

2003-11-09 Thread Tal, Shachar
Hi Amichai, I believe w3c.org has an HTML/XHTML/strict etc. validator online, so this can be verified online by users. In the event someone wants to post a rating of Israeli sites, one just needs to write a 5-liner perl/python script and beautify the results :) Shachar -Original

RE: Redhat 9 slowness - continued

2003-11-09 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Nadav Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 10:38 PM To: Oleg Kobets Cc: Zvi Har'El; My Own Private List Subject: Re: Redhat 9 slowness - continued On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Oleg Kobets wrote about Re: Redhat 9 slowness -

RE: Meeting with Gadi Gilon

2003-11-04 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Shlomi Fish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:46 PM To: Shachar Shemesh Cc: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: Meeting with Gadi Gilon I'm fine with it. Albeit, it could turn into a one against many flame-war. Then we'll just have to

RE: Meeting with Gadi Gilon

2003-11-04 Thread Tal, Shachar
Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:25 PM To: Linux-IL mailing list Subject: Re: Meeting with Gadi Gilon http://www.newsforge.com/software/03/10/18/1814211.shtml?tid=132tid=82tid= 89 What

RE: grip rips at 4x speed instead of close to CD-ROM full-speed

2003-10-26 Thread Tal, Shachar
Hi Shlomi, 1. Is the other drive (DVD/CDR) idle during the ripping? IDE is not as efficient as SCSI with regard to multiple devices using the IDE bus at the same time. 2. Please send hdparm -i / -v output. 3. Which format do you encode to? What is the CPU usage of the encoding process? Are you

RE: grip rips at 4x speed instead of close to CD-ROM full-speed

2003-10-26 Thread Tal, Shachar
26, 2003 2:10 PM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: Linux-IL Subject: RE: grip rips at 4x speed instead of close to CD-ROM full-speed On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Tal, Shachar wrote: Hi Shlomi, 1. Is the other drive (DVD/CDR) idle during the ripping? IDE is not as efficient as SCSI with regard to multiple devices

GPL Licensing Question

2003-10-26 Thread Tal, Shachar
Hi all, I have a GPL licensing question that came from a customer of mine: That customer is currently developing a distributed client-server, where the communication protocols between clients and servers are non-standard (i.e. not HTTP or likes of it). The customer wishes to include

RE: GPL Licensing Question

2003-10-26 Thread Tal, Shachar
Thanks. Though, his particular implementation is patented, hence his reluctance to release it under the GPL. Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 7:25 PM To: Tal, Shachar; '[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: ADSL - What is the current recommendation?

2003-10-19 Thread Tal, Shachar
There are many xDSL standards: ADSL (Asymmetric DSL), SDSL (Symmetric DSL), DSL Lite, DSLAM, G.Lite, HDSL, IDSL, RADSL, UDSL, VDSL and more. However, AFAIK, each standard is exactly that - a standard. Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: filesystem for database box

2003-10-19 Thread Tal, Shachar
I'm not such an FS expert, so please step in to correct me in case I am wrong. All large databases (Oracle, UDB, MSSQL) have two different access patterns for files. One type is data access, one type is log file access. The question is now obviously divided into two questions: Which FS should

Open-source webcrawler required

2003-10-09 Thread Tal, Shachar
Hi All, I am in need of an (open-source) web crawler (a-la wget), but one that does all of the following: 1. Performs breadth-first search, not depth-first search. (so stopping condition based of disk space will give a wide crawl, rather than a deep crawl). 2. Can let me defined whether to

RE: OpenVPN, from the 1st of October supports Win32

2003-10-09 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Eli Marmor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenVPN, from the 1st of October supports Win32 Tzahi Fadida wrote: Exchange have a web interface so maybe ssh will suffice for all your

RE: OpenVPN, from the 1st of October supports Win32

2003-10-09 Thread Tal, Shachar
-Original Message- From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:44 PM To: Tal, Shachar; 'Eli Marmor'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenVPN, from the 1st of October supports Win32 On Thursday 09 October 2003 15:26, Tal, Shachar wrote: -Original

RE: Linux-il archives to be closed

2003-10-08 Thread Tal, Shachar
Don't be alarmed regarding WICC's complete lack of response. Having worked for the another university's CC (while being a student), I remember being truely amazed by how much politics alone call the shots in this kind of places, on topic such as salaries, promotions/demotions, who get sabatticals,

RE: Networking my new home (or RJ45's vs. WiFi)

2003-09-28 Thread Tal, Shachar
There was a recent Ask Slashdot article about this exact topic, which I found very helpful (look at the +4/+5 comments). Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:12 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: Propaganda Point (was: Re: linux support companies in Israel)

2003-09-22 Thread Tal, Shachar
Tzafir, I beg to differ. Win95 was launched in... errr... '95. Same as NT4 (very early '96 if I am not mistaken). Clearly this 7-8 year period is longer than RedHat's / SuSE's support period. Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Linux on a laptop

2003-09-17 Thread Tal, Shachar
Both Linux and Windows 2000. Shachar Tal Verint Systems -Original Message- From: Shlomo Yona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:26 PM To: Tal, Shachar Cc: Hetz Ben Hamo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Linux on a laptop On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tal, Shachar