On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Omer Zak wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:37 +0200, Efraim Yawitz wrote:
I have a PDF file (a scanned book) which appears much clearer in Adobe Acrobat
Reader than in Ghostscript (gv, actually). Evidently, Adobe does some kind of
smoothing that Ghostscript doesn't.
Hi,
I have a PDF file (a scanned book) which appears much clearer in Adobe Acrobat
Reader than in Ghostscript (gv, actually). Evidently, Adobe does some kind of
smoothing that Ghostscript doesn't. Does anyone know a setting or something to
make Ghostscript also do this or is it just not
some kind of smoothing that Ghostscript doesn't. Does anyone know a
setting or something to make Ghostscript also do this or is it just not
implemented?
Does
gv --antialias
make it better?
=
To unsubscribe, send
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:37 +0200, Efraim Yawitz wrote:
I have a PDF file (a scanned book) which appears much clearer in Adobe
Acrobat Reader than in Ghostscript (gv, actually). Evidently, Adobe does
some kind of smoothing that Ghostscript doesn't. Does anyone know a setting
or something
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:37 +0200, Efraim Yawitz wrote:
Hi,
I have a PDF file (a scanned book) which appears much clearer in Adobe
Acrobat Reader than in Ghostscript (gv, actually). Evidently, Adobe does
some kind of smoothing that Ghostscript doesn't. Does anyone know a setting
or
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Omer Zak wrote:
Did you try other PDF viewers?
In my Debian Sarge installation, I have gpdf, kpdf and xpdf.
Thanks. I just downloaded the newest xpdf and it looks great. I had
remembered having problems with this program, but I guess that was with earlier
versions.
