Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Ravid Baruch Naali
Hi Amos, I had the chance to help developer, which use to work with Visual Studio, start using Linux/Unix environment. My conclusions were: - Most Linux IDE use gdb as a debugger, some wrap it more user friendly and some less. - Kdevelope, DDD and Emacs plug-in are very useful for the

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Amos Shapira wrote: On 01/09/07, *Yotam Rubin* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the main issue? Is it that it's impossible to work with GDB because it crashes, or is it gdb's command line interface? If the problem is the latter, then have him use a decent

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Shamir Udi
i Agree, The CDT is a great tool, it's saves development time by supporting realtime compilation. Visual Studio does not support this feature unless installing the visual assist application. -Udi. On 9/2/07, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amos Shapira wrote: On 01/09/07,

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Shamir Udi wrote: i Agree, The CDT is a great tool, it's saves development time by supporting realtime compilation. Heheh... actually, that's the first thing I turn off in a new installation of Eclipse/CDT ;-) But this is a question of taste, nothing more. Seriously, I've walked through

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Amos Shapira
On 02/09/07, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shamir Udi wrote: i Agree, The CDT is a great tool, it's saves development time by supporting realtime compilation. Seriously, I've walked through and hand held more then 40 different code developing corporations in the last 4

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Amos Shapira
On 01/09/07, Marc Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiya. First - SlickEdit costs US$250-450 per seat. And while it is ok as an IDE, it has quite a few limitations especially as far as debugging is concerned. From its web site I didn't see it mention debugger interface at all, actually.

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-02 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Amos Shapira wrote: On 01/09/07, *Marc Volovic* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll try to give him another push to give KDevelop and CDT a go - it'll require him to install X11 on his Windows laptop and hopefully the dev server will handle the Java app. Here's a another

Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Amos Shapira
Hello, We are at this stage were the lead C++ developer needs to switch over our mostly ACE-based applications from Windows to Linux and needs a GOOD and CONVENIENT debugging environment for multi-threaded applications. He's giving a honest effort to use gdb but so far found it very hard to work

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Maxim Veksler
On 9/1/07, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We are at this stage were the lead C++ developer needs to switch over our mostly ACE-based applications from Windows to Linux and needs a GOOD and CONVENIENT debugging environment for multi-threaded applications. He's giving a honest

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Marc Volovic
Hiya. First - SlickEdit costs US$250-450 per seat. And while it is ok as an IDE, it has quite a few limitations especially as far as debugging is concerned. There are NO good integrated development environments for Linux. Slickedit, Eclipse, etc, are a reasonable set of editing tools, but very

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Yotam Rubin
What's the main issue? Is it that it's impossible to work with GDB because it crashes, or is it gdb's command line interface? If the problem is the latter, then have him use a decent frontend. I use emacs's gdbsrc mode, which integrates control of the debugger with your existing code buffers. Some

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Dvir Volk
Kdevelop is a really nice IDE and has great gdb integration, I prefer it over eclipse. On 9/1/07, Yotam Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the main issue? Is it that it's impossible to work with GDB because it crashes, or is it gdb's command line interface? If the problem is the latter,

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Oded Arbel
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 08:16 +, Amos Shapira wrote: Hello, We are at this stage were the lead C++ developer needs to switch over our mostly ACE-based applications from Windows to Linux and needs a GOOD and CONVENIENT debugging environment for multi-threaded applications. Can anyone

Re: Commercial/FOSS C++ dev env for Linux?

2007-09-01 Thread Amos Shapira
On 01/09/07, Yotam Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the main issue? Is it that it's impossible to work with GDB because it crashes, or is it gdb's command line interface? If the problem is the latter, then have him use a decent frontend. I use emacs's gdbsrc mode, which integrates