* Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040528 08:51]:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:01:50AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
how about network?
was it out of the box? how much setup did you need?
Network is seperated into 2 - you can use the TUN support (which
frankly, I didn't yet manage to use
Quoting Hetz Ben Hamo, from the post of Thu, 27 May:
* It's not only emulating full X86 system, but also:
* PowerPC (604 for now)
* ARM 7
* Sparc (no FPU yet)
in other words it works more like bochs than VMWARE and will probably
never reach the execution speed of native
Layman's question:
would I be able to run my other-partition's WinXP with it?
--
Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ 162180901
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Uri Sharf wrote:
The User Mode sounds interesting, any experiance with that?
One exception: You need a modified kernel for the simulated system.
For instance, I want to install a standard distro on that simulated
machine. Here's what you need to do to
Actually UML is not that complicated considering the fact that
precompiled kernel rpms exist (both for host and for UML machines):
http://www.nrh-up2date.org/howto/uml/packages/
Guy
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 18:06, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:14:43PM +0200, Uri Sharf wrote:
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi People,
Lately I've been following a project which might interest few people
here. It's called: QEMU
QEMU is an open source Virtual PC emulator. Unlike BOCHS, it's quite
fast (a bit slower then VMWare, but not by much)..
Although the project is in version 0.5.x stages
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi People,
Lately I've been following a project which might interest few people
here. It's called: QEMU
QEMU is an open source Virtual PC emulator. Unlike BOCHS, it's
quite fast (a bit slower then VMWare, but not by much)..
Although the project is in
yuval tanny wrote:
Hetz,
How hard is to install XP or 2000? special kernel? special modules?
How hard is to run knoppixes from this beast?
I use it (QEMU) to try LiveCDs. It works, but slowly (very slow
compare to VMWare). To run knoppix:
qemu -cdrom knoppix.iso -m 200
This gives knoppix 200MB of
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Layman's question:
would I be able to run my other-partition's WinXP with it?
Well, there's a script to convert VMWare images to full hard drive
image, but it's not stable yet to replace VMWare. Trust me on that ;)
Also the network stuff is using SLiRP (or TUN, depends how
One exception: You need a modified kernel for the simulated system.
Wrong.
I've used standard redhat 9 as guest and it worked out of the box
without any kernel compilation, not in guest side nor in the host side.
Only thing you do need is the ne2k module (which is compiled by default
on most
Hetz,
How hard is to install XP or 2000? special kernel? special modules?
I installed XP at work with it without much problems, but there are some
emulation problems with QEMU, so remember - it's not finished product.
How hard is to run knoppixes from this beast?
Runs excellent. Put the CD in
how about network?
was it out of the box? how much setup did you need?
Network is seperated into 2 - you can use the TUN support (which
frankly, I didn't yet manage to use it) or the SLiRP support (compile
QEMU with --enable-slirp and user -user-net when you launch QEMU)
With SLiRP, QEMU will
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:01:50AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
how about network?
was it out of the box? how much setup did you need?
Network is seperated into 2 - you can use the TUN support (which
frankly, I didn't yet manage to use it) or the SLiRP support (compile
QEMU with
13 matches
Mail list logo
