Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
guy keren wrote:
when you can use valgrind - most other things are pretty useless.
did you encounter a memory-handling bug that valgrind failed to catch,
while another tool (such as libsafe) did catch?
note: i never used libsafe, so i might be missing something - i
Hi Guy,
guy keren wrote:
AFAIK Valgrind does not detect neither stack nor static buffer
overflows at all.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat c2.c
#include stdio.h
void f(char* p_i )
{
char i[1024];
f(i);
}
int main()
{
f((char*)NULL);
return 0;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -Wall
guy keren wrote:
when you can use valgrind - most other things are pretty useless.
did you encounter a memory-handling bug that valgrind failed to catch,
while another tool (such as libsafe) did catch?
note: i never used libsafe, so i might be missing something - i simply
compared
Hi people,
I am fighting with stack corruption problem in my appilcation
I wanted to use libsafe , but debian/ubuntu packages are not accessible,
so I built libsafe manually from source tar distribution
And now, I see from trace ouput that altough my calls are indeed
intercepted in preloaded
You can try to use valgrind.
Valery
--- On Sun, 5/18/08, Lev Olshvang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Lev Olshvang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Corrupted stack - Why Ubuntu 7.10 does not have libsafe; does not
show errors in ?
To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Date: Sunday, May 18, 2008
wrote:
You can try to use valgrind.
Valery
--- On Sun, 5/18/08, Lev Olshvang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Lev Olshvang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Corrupted stack - Why Ubuntu 7.10 does not have libsafe; does not
show errors in ?
To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Date: Sunday, May 18
- Why Ubuntu 7.10 does not have libsafe;
does not show errors in ?
To: linux-il linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Date: Sunday, May 18, 2008, 4:47 PM
Hi people,
I am fighting with stack corruption problem in my
appilcation
I wanted to use libsafe , but debian/ubuntu packages are
not accessible,
so I built
