No, relax...
RH 8.0 will be out about March/April which is the time frame of GCC 3.1 is
out
Besides, it's not that they have a choise - RH releases a new major version
about every 18 months. What do you want them to do? release 8.0 with gcc
3.0.X and include GCC 3.1 at 2003? ;)
On Thursd
oh my god, that mean another 2.96 gcc..
why can't they install a normal gcc as well?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> On Thu 2001-12-13, Ely Levy wrote:
> > 3.1 is a redhat release of gcc no?
> > or is it the beta of the "
On Thu 2001-12-13, Ely Levy wrote:
> 3.1 is a redhat release of gcc no?
> or is it the beta of the "offcial" gcc?
There is no gcc 3.1 yet. When it comes out you will see it on gcc.gnu.org.
According to http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html it will take about 3 months.
gcc 3.0.2 is quite good already
3.1 is a redhat release of gcc no?
or is it the beta of the "offcial" gcc?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> On Thu 2001-12-13, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
>
> > Adios binary compatibility, GCC 3.0.x probably won't see the lig
On Thu 2001-12-13, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Adios binary compatibility, GCC 3.0.x probably won't see the light of day in
> Redhat distributions
Binary compatibility between what?
BTW The idea was to stabilize the ABI (binary interface) so that gcc 3.x.y
would be binary compatible with gcc 3.z
Hi People,
Well, just in case you think Redhat is not mad enough (or doesn't have the
balls to jump into extremly dangerous water) - look at this: (from rawhide's
directory)
..whide/i386/RedHat/RPMS > ls -l gcc*
-rw-r--r--1 529 529 3466485 Dec 4 10:39
gcc-3.1-0.10.i386.rpm
-rw-r
