On Monday 17 November 2003 05:54, Micha Feigin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:11:08PM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
If you are warried about hardware support for Linux -- than try to accept
only OSS drivers and wait for critical mass to force the vendors.
but I also want my hardware to work,
On Monday 17 November 2003 05:54, you wrote:
solutions, but I also want my hardware to work, and to have some
proffessional quallity software that there is no chance will ever hit the
opensource. Although drifting off again, peer pressure wont solve all the
opensource problems. Lets see peer
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:01:37AM +0200, Idan Sofer wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2003 05:54, you wrote:
solutions, but I also want my hardware to work, and to have some
professional quality software that there is no chance will ever hit the
opensource. Although drifting off again, peer
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:02:05AM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2003 05:54, Micha Feigin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:11:08PM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
If you are warried about hardware support for Linux -- than try to accept
only OSS drivers and wait for critical
On Monday 17 November 2003 15:29, Micha Feigin wrote:
The problem is with older hardware I pick up from people that no longer
use it (which is most of my hardware).
This is right to the point.
Having hardware with binary drivers is like having an expiration
date built into the hardware (Pag
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 12:51, Omer Zak wrote:
[... snipped ...]
2. If Linus allows use of closed code Kernel modules with Linux and they
probably are obfuscation champions of the Linux world, then Ilan
should be entitled to ask about the
On Sunday 16 November 2003 16:38, Omer Zak wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 12:51, Omer Zak wrote:
[... snipped ...]
2. If Linus allows use of closed code Kernel modules with Linux and
they probably are obfuscation champions of the Linux
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 16:38, Omer Zak wrote:
I don't think the question was stupid. If anyone earned the 'stupid'
label in this story it is those managers, who caused the need for the
question in the first place.
This is because I learned some things from the
On Sunday 16 November 2003 19:46, Micha Feigin wrote:
Allowing binary only modules has its advantages ...
... This approach opens up the chance for more hardware support for
linux...
This is very shortsighted point of view. If most of the Linux developers
would think so, we could have in a few
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:11:08PM +0200, Oron Peled wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 19:46, Micha Feigin wrote:
Allowing binary only modules has its advantages ...
... This approach opens up the chance for more hardware support for
linux...
This is very shortsighted point of view. If
10 matches
Mail list logo
