Re: Making Linux Look Harder Than What It Is (or: Why do newbies still have a hard time after a 'deep' explanation?)

2001-12-11 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > What about Mozilla? The Best browser for Linux (and any >>other OS as >> well). >>>And heaviest (even comparing to IE). It has many problems, yet, >>> I'll also note that I don't think it is inherently heavier than IE. Only problem is that you cann

RE: Making Linux Look Harder Than What It Is (or: Why do newbies still have a hard time after a 'deep' explanation?)

2001-12-11 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
> > > What about Mozilla? The Best browser for Linux (and any > other OS as > > > well). > > > > > And heaviest (even comparing to IE). It has many problems, yet, > and, still, > > sux. > > For the record, although this was not doubt true for previous versions, IMHO the latest version of M

Re: Making Linux Look Harder Than What It Is (or: Why do newbies still have a hard time after a 'deep' explanation?)

2001-12-10 Thread Ez-Aton
al window is scary, and it's an unknown realm. It should be brought slowly, but it should be shown to them, as a tool of work, and not as target work. > Regards, > > Shlomi Fish > > There is no IGLU Cabal! It was impossible to construct one using GUI tools > only. > Ez.

Re: Making Linux Look Harder Than What It Is (or: Why do newbies still have a hard time after a 'deep' explanation?)

2001-12-10 Thread Ez-Aton
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Ez-Aton wrote: > > It doesn't matter. Most of the people in the world use IE. They need an > > alternative. I'm affraid Netscape is a poor alternative, and Opera is not a > > complete one, yet. Konqueror? Far from it. Flash was an example, taken from > > the article. Flash