On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation:
i mean, the way i see it - kde is all about bringing ease of use to
Linux. and it does that, but just AFTER you install it.
for, let's say, an advanced newbie, upgrading will be possible but
annoying, if not difficult
Nadav Har'El wrote:
Newbies should not care about upgrading individual packages. They would
just get the latest distribution (e.g., Redhat is released every 6 months)
and install/upgrade it. Upgrading redhat is an almost trivial operation:
you still the CD-ROM in, choose upgrade, and it
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation:
i mean, the way i see it - kde is all about bringing ease of use to
Linux. and it does that, but just AFTER you install it.
for, let's say, an advanced newbie, upgrading will be possible but
annoying
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote about Re: KDE 3.0 Instelation:
7.0 begat 7.0 respin and about 80meg of updates. 7.1 needed about the
same. At last count my 7.2 system needed almost 150 meg of updates, not
counting GCC 3, which I installed manualy as some things will compile
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote about KDE 3.0 Instelation:
I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
didn't work.
all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong to
what package.
I think its shame that they put such
rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
rpm -Uvh *rpm --nodeps --force...
worked perfect here ;)
Hetz
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 03:08 pm, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Damn
I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
didn't work.
all the dependencies are ruined and
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote about KDE 3.0 Instelation:
I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously
it
didn't work.
all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong
to
what package.
I think its shame that they put such
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
You left out the '^'
rpm -Uvh *rpm --nodeps --force...
worked perfect here ;)
'rm -rf /' will work fine next time you try it givenm you are root)
What if you have a package called 'hookdesktop' ? It will be
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
I just did:
cd /usr/local/src
mkdir kde3
cd kde3
ftp ftp.sunet.se
login as anonymous
cd /pub/kde/stable/latest/Red Hat/i386
bin
prompt
mget *.rpm
quit
then, rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force *.rpm
After that, worked like a charm. Make sure you have
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Ariel Biener wrote:
I just did:
cd /usr/local/src
mkdir kde3
cd kde3
ftp ftp.sunet.se
login as anonymous
cd /pub/kde/stable/latest/Red Hat/i386
bin
prompt
mget *.rpm
quit
then, rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force *.rpm
Just out of curiosity: what happens if you don't
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Except ...
Except nothing. Everything worked.
RPM's dependencies should have verified such silly stuff for you, right?
Sure, but I used --nodeps
--Ariel
--
Ariel Biener
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP(6.5.8) public key
PROTECTED]
To: Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ben-Nes Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux ILUG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: KDE 3.0 Instelation
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
You left out
-6241952 |
http://www.netvision.net.il http://www.nana.co.il
NetVision LTD. Omega Center, Matam Haifa 31905
-Original Message-
From: Ariel Biener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:45 PM
To: Tzafrir Cohen
Cc: linux ILUG
Subject: Re: KDE 3.0 Instelation
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
such), and seperate packages for the extra stuff such as devel
packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
i mean,
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 15:19, you wrote:
which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
such), and seperate packages for the extra stuff such as devel
packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
i
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation:
which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
such), and seperate packages for the extra stuff such as devel
packages, koffice
I liked the zillion packages. You see, sometimes I jsut want
one component,
not the entire warehouse.
I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
IS GOOD.
but you i would also like to see a bundled package with all the
necessary files and libs inside.
i mean,
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 18:43, Dvir Volk wrote:
I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
IS GOOD.
but you i would also like to see a bundled package with all the
necessary files and libs inside.
agreed. Linux is among others about choice.
maybe there should
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
I liked the zillion packages. You see, sometimes I jsut want
one component,
not the entire warehouse.
I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
IS GOOD.
but you i would also like to see a bundled package withall the
19 matches
Mail list logo
