Re: sys / db performance block size

2005-09-14 Thread Michael Ben-Nes
After a week of testing i decided to go with JFS as the FS for Postgres. im not an expert benchmarker so I hope I initiated the right parameters in bonnie pgbench. The bonnie command: bonnie++ -u miki -b -d /data/bonnie/ -s 6080:8k -m pr1 pgbench commands: pgbench -i -s 10 test pgbench -c

RE: sys / db performance block size

2005-09-14 Thread Tzahi Fadida
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Ben-Nes Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: linux-il@linux.org.il Subject: Re: sys / db performance block size After a week of testing i decided to go with JFS as the FS

Re: sys / db performance block size

2005-09-06 Thread Michael Ben-Nes
After few test, not certain yet i found *Surprise*Surprise* ext3 is quite fast especially when using dir_index This is the command i issued. i was recommended going on Journal size of 400 ( not really sure why ). mke2fs -j -J size=400 -O dir_index -T largefile /dev/sdb1 testing it with

Re: sys / db performance block size

2005-09-05 Thread Amos Shapira
On 9/5/05, Michael Ben-Nes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im setting up a Postgresql sql server on IBM x345, dual xeon, raid1 ( 2 disks ), raid10 ( 4 disks ). The db data will be stored on the RAID10 and will consist mostly of product table of 5 mil rows and keywords table with 60 mil rows. ..

RE: sys / db performance block size

2005-09-05 Thread Tzahi Fadida
First, its better to ask the experts on this matters at pgsql-general@postgresql.org It is not definitive that for postgresql you'd better set 8kb block size since the OS already coalleses the files close together anyway and there is no guarentee the page will be aligned to the hardware block