On 6 Mar 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock
erez.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use.
The most common argument against using xdm at startup (runlevel 5 [1] is
that if you change the hardware or the settings the X server may
through there.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use.
The most common argument against using xdm at startup (runlevel 5 [1] is
that if you change the hardware or the settings the X server may fail to
load and then you get
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console
be solved with basic
UNIX concepts :)
Adi, the problem with your (and Shachar's) suggestion is that it will
still cause my sound to disappear. And besides, run-level 5 was introduced
Hi Shlomi,
I don't understand what the problem is.
Are you saying startx gives you sound in X, but exec startx
-=O0~O0=-
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought -
So rested he by the Tumtum tree.
And stood awhile in thought.
[L.Carrol Jabberwacky]
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Christoph Bugel wrote:
[1] runlevel
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a malicious
user can switch to the console from which it was invoked, press Ctrl+C or
Ctrl
On Tue 2002-03-05, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a malicious
user can switch to the console from
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a malicious
user can
On Tue 2002-03-05, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
.
I made xdm not start an X server (comment the last line in
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers) and have written an init.d script that runs
'X -query localhost' in a loop with a 'sleep 30' between them.
That way, if X fails to start, I have 30 seconds to log
eventaully became non-functional for some reason. It's probably a
bug of some sort, but I have better things to do with my time than to try
and sort it out.
3. Using Run-Level 5. That way, no virtual console are needed to invoke
the X-server.
4. do exec startx. This way there is no shell behind
13 matches
Mail list logo
