(A bit off-topic) chess via Skype in Linux. was: Re: Skype sound problems

2009-02-25 Thread Dan Shimshoni
Hello, While we are @skype, I want to offtopic this : I heard that on windows you can play chess via Skype. I wonder: did anybody tried it successfully on Linux ? (and forgive me for this off-topic interrupt) Rgs, DS On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Noam Rathaus no...@beyondsecurity.com

Re: (A bit off-topic) chess via Skype in Linux. was: Re: Skype sound problems

2009-02-25 Thread Dvir Volk
Skype extras (plugins) are AFAIK platform specific. While skype for linux does support them, from what I see on their site, the list for linux is pretty lame: https://extras.skype.com/categories/19/good From looking at the source of one of them, they seem to be written in C++ using Qt, which

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-29 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:45:18PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: And you're correct here, but the obfuscation was done by the compiler, not the programmer. Standard C++ name mangling, something about QAction and QObject. There is a nifty utility to undo the mangling and give you the function's

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-29 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:23,Ilya Konstantinov: 1. You having an old version of Qt. Solution: Upgrade your Qt to the version which Skype claims it requires. 2. You having a version of Qt compiled with an old compiler (g++ pre-3.0). You can find it out by doing: objdump -T

Re: [Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-25 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:51:43PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Why not just run it through strace and find out? A curious thing -- trying to run 'strace ./skype' works, while trying to attach to a running Skype fails (Permission denied). I assume it's an strace bug, though; not an

Re: [Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-25 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Ilya Konstantinov wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:51:43PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Why not just run it through strace and find out? A curious thing -- trying to run 'strace ./skype' works, while trying to attach to a running Skype fails (Permission denied). I assume it's an strace

[Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-23 Thread Amichai Rotman
Hello, fellow Penguins, It seems there's a Skype Beta for Linux. I used the RPM version, and it is my understanding the source isn't included. Would you think it is safe to use? Thanks, Reff: http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,2935424,00.html http://www.skype.com/download_linux.html

Re: [Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-23 Thread Micha Feigin
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 02:10:32PM +0300, Amichai Rotman wrote: Hello, fellow Penguins, It seems there's a Skype Beta for Linux. I used the RPM version, and it is my understanding the source isn't included. Would you think it is safe to use? Thanks, It would probably be as safe

Re: [Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-23 Thread Vasiliev Michael
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 16:17, Micha Feigin wrote: [skipped] MF It would probably be as safe as the windows versions. There is MF supposedly no spyware in there but there is no way tell (actually you MF could try listening in but I doubt you would recognize bad traffic from MF good one). One

Re: [Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-23 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Vasiliev Michael wrote: On Wednesday 23 June 2004 16:17, Micha Feigin wrote: [skipped] MF It would probably be as safe as the windows versions. There is MF supposedly no spyware in there but there is no way tell (actually you MF could try listening in but I doubt you would recognize bad traffic

Re: [Software] Skype for Linux !

2004-06-23 Thread Vasiliev Michael
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 22:51, Shachar Shemesh wrote: [skipped] SS Why not just run it through strace and find out? Sure, it is in my to-do list, only as soon as it won't crash in my hands right away, and will run for at least through configuring stage. So far, I am lucky enough to hit the

Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Noam L.
Skype for Linux was released today, :) http://skype.com/download_linux.html Enjoy -- Regards, Noam L. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command echo

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Here it works. I am available as elcuco or cuco. Funny I cannot find my self. Monday 21 June 2004 15:46,Kfir Lavi: Noam L. wrote: Skype for Linux was released today, :) http://skype.com/download_linux.html Enjoy -- Regards, Noam L. Tried it and it crashes. I'm useing

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
Here, on my FC1, it cries: skype: relocation error: skype: undefined symbol: _ZN7QActionC1EP7QObjectPKc and returns 127. Any idea why? On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:29:08PM +, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Here it works. I am available as elcuco or cuco. Funny I cannot find my self. -- Dan

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:46:21PM +0300, Kfir Lavi wrote: Noam L. wrote: Skype for Linux was released today, :) http://skype.com/download_linux.html Enjoy -- Regards, Noam L. Tried it and it crashes. I'm useing Debian Sid. Kfir Just tried it also on debian sid and it runs fine

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Dan Kenigsberg, from the post of Mon, 21 Jun: Here, on my FC1, it cries: skype: relocation error: skype: undefined symbol: _ZN7QActionC1EP7QObjectPKc and returns 127. Any idea why? I'd say search in the source but I'm guessing you can't get much further than strace with

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:21:05PM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: Quoting Dan Kenigsberg, from the post of Mon, 21 Jun: Here, on my FC1, it cries: skype: relocation error: skype: undefined symbol: _ZN7QActionC1EP7QObjectPKc and returns 127. Any idea why? I'd say search in the

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Omer Zak
Ira Abramov wrote: Quoting Dan Kenigsberg, from the post of Mon, 21 Jun: Here, on my FC1, it cries: skype: relocation error: skype: undefined symbol: _ZN7QActionC1EP7QObjectPKc and returns 127. Any idea why? I'd say search in the source but I'm guessing you can't get much further than strace with

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:28:52PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: Here, on my FC1, it cries: skype: relocation error: skype: undefined symbol: _ZN7QActionC1EP7QObjectPKc and returns 127. Any idea why? Don't know qt but the symbol looks like a QT problem. What version of the qt libraries

Re: Skype for Linux

2004-06-21 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:53:47PM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:21:05PM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: Quoting Dan Kenigsberg, from the post of Mon, 21 Jun: Here, on my FC1, it cries: skype: relocation error: skype: undefined symbol:

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-24 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Ilya Konstantinov, from the post of Fri, 21 May: On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:23:25PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote: No one forces you to use it. Unless all your friends use it, including the Linux-using ones. Then it prohibits you from communicating with the world. when the need becomes

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-20 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Wednesday 19 May 2004 1:26 pm,Micha Feigin: I don't think gaim has video conferencing support yet. does not. The only free linux solution I know of is gnomemeeting/ohphone which can connect to netmeeting on windows (it exists under W2K although you need to activate it as its not in the

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-20 Thread Micha Feigin
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:18:56AM +, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Wednesday 19 May 2004 1:26 pm,Micha Feigin: I don't think gaim has video conferencing support yet. does not. The only free linux solution I know of is gnomemeeting/ohphone which can connect to netmeeting on windows

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-20 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:12:26PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: Considering they will have to start making money somehow at some point in order to keep from going under (it looks like the company is going after profit and not fun) they will have to add extra features for pay (such as answering

RE: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-20 Thread Tzahi Fadida
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:12:26PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: Considering they will have to start making money somehow at some point in order to keep from going under (it looks like the company is going after profit and not fun) they will have

RE: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-20 Thread Arik Baratz
-Original Message- From: Tzahi Fadida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] there are numerous others that can do the same. the only difference of skype to others is that if you are in some office or some isp that don't provide a real ip(which is not really done anymore since no one will

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-20 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:23:25PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote: No one forces you to use it. Unless all your friends use it, including the Linux-using ones. Then it prohibits you from communicating with the world. Skype is not a router it makes use of the application layer. You can write your

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Aaron
with the worms/viruses etc but must have program X which doen't work on Linux. I feel that the proprietory model will not die or for that matter closed source software. What can change it there support and attitude. This happens when they start competing with linux software. BTW Skype does run

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Ehud Karni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 May 2004 01:15:05 +, Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and yet, I have not decent way to talk with my family abroad using linux/free tools. Any ideas? You can try http://speak-freely.sourceforge.net/ . I used it several

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Noam Rathaus
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 12:59, Ehud Karni wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 May 2004 01:15:05 +, Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and yet, I have not decent way to talk with my family abroad using linux/free tools. Any ideas? You can try

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Ilya Konstantinov wrote: Something tells me Skype for Linux is not going to be Hofshi in any way... (judging from their statements on their beloved proprietary protocol) That dosen't worry me at all. What worries me is the license and the technology. In order to get it to work at all

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Aaron wrote: About $20 unlimited phoning. (sorry my mailer ate your original message). There are two competing companies vor VoIP to telephone service in the U.S. Packet8 is the cheaper they are $20 a month. You place a propritary box on your network and connect a phone to it. You can then call

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Micha Feigin
weeks. I will advise when it is done and can be downloaded. Thanks for your patience. Something tells me Skype for Linux is not going to be Hofshi in any way... (judging from their statements on their beloved proprietary protocol) If it's indeed going to be so, I hope you guys won't fall

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:15:05AM +, Diego Iastrubni wrote: Tuesday 18 May 2004 9:51 pm,Ilya Konstantinov: Besides, if their version would have sucky Hebrew support, you couldn't fix it. If it wouldn't have ALSA support, you couldn't fix it. You'd be at their mercy, since by then

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Eran Sandler
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 16:26, Micha Feigin wrote: I don't think gaim has video conferencing support yet. Actually there is a fork of gaim called gaim-vv (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaim-vv). It suppose to add video conferencing support to gaim. Eran

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Wed, May 19, 2004, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote about Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux: Packet8 is the cheaper they are $20 a month. You place a propritary box on your network and connect a phone to it. You can then call the U.S. or Canada for no incremental cost over the $20 a month. I wonder

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread linux-il
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: Aaron wrote: About $20 unlimited phoning. (sorry my mailer ate your original message). There are two competing companies vor VoIP to telephone service in the U.S. You are assuming people only want to call the US. But there are other countries I want to call to

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-19 Thread Aaron
YOur most probably right, I never bought into this so it I never gave it much thought. Aaron On ד', 2004-05-19 at 17:23, Nadav Har'El wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2004, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote about Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux: Packet8 is the cheaper they are $20 a month. You place

RE: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux - an alternative

2004-05-19 Thread Arik Baratz
-Original Message- From: Diego Iastrubni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:15 AM To: Ilya Konstantinov; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Linux-IL Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux and yet, I have not decent way to talk with my family abroad using linux/free

Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-18 Thread Shlomo Solomon
Hi, A while back, I submitted a request for a Linux version of Skype. Here's the answer I got today. Notice that you can click on a link to add support for this request, although I have no idea if this will speed up the process. FYI -- Forwarded Message -- Thank you

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-18 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Please Shlomo, post when its available. Tuesday 18 May 2004 4:01 pm,Shlomo Solomon: Hi, A while back, I submitted a request for a Linux version of Skype. Here's the answer I got today. Notice that you can click on a link to add support for this request, although I have no idea

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-18 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
for your patience. Something tells me Skype for Linux is not going to be Hofshi in any way... (judging from their statements on their beloved proprietary protocol) If it's indeed going to be so, I hope you guys won't fall into the convenience trap. Sure, there is other closed software many of you

Re: Fwd: FW: Skype for Linux

2004-05-18 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Tuesday 18 May 2004 9:51 pm,Ilya Konstantinov: Besides, if their version would have sucky Hebrew support, you couldn't fix it. If it wouldn't have ALSA support, you couldn't fix it. You'd be at their mercy, since by then all your buddies use Skype to chat. and yet, I have not decent way to