solved my problems, it turns out that I was subscribed using an aliased email
(just shows how long I'm on the list, haven't used that in about 7 years I
think. I'm surprised tau left the alias).
Thanks
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:36 +0200
Barry.R big...@zahav.net.il wrote:
On Friday 30 January
On Friday 30 January 2009 22:04:59 Micha Feigin wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:06:55 +0200
Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
[...]
I could understand the use for reply to list when some people would
get double the emails against their wishes. This, however, is no longer
an issue
If I'm summarizing your argument correctly, you are saying that mailing
list discussions should ALWAYS be public, no matter what. That it is the
mailing list that I'm conversing with, and not the individuals who
participate in the mailing list thread.
It is an interesting notion. One I
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
If I'm summarizing your argument correctly, you are saying that
mailing list discussions should ALWAYS be public, no matter what. That
it is the mailing list that I'm conversing with, and not the
individuals who participate in the mailing list thread.
On further
Hi Shachar and Oleg, I decided to reply now just so it be known that Oleg's
opinion isn't bizarre or outlandish, but rather an opinion held by many.
I agree with every word that Oleg said on this subject.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: The new linux-il - a few
tips to get
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
If I'm summarizing your argument correctly, you are saying that mailing
list discussions should ALWAYS be public, no matter what. That it is the
mailing list that I'm conversing with, and not
Nadav Har'El wrote:
When I was a child, one of the most important rules of etiquette that I
learned was that there should be no secrets in company
Just so my position is clear. I will stress again that the default
should be that the list be CCed. I just think this should be done with a
reply
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: The new linux-il - a few
tips to get you (re)started:
Would you want to
be in a mailing list where a few people get the list's message more quickly
then you do (because they're on the CC - Shachar wants this to happen) so
whenever you read
2009/1/30 Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org:
Well, this whole topic is almost as old as Linux-IL, but since we are
at it again... IMHO, the reply-to-all to send to the list paradigm
is totally broken. If I send a message to a discussion mailing list
such as Linux-IL I expect any responses to
I should also mention that if one is not careful and presses Reply
instead of Reply To All, the reply is off-list! So many times I've
gotten private mail from _this_list_ when I'm certain it was meant to
be public.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
I think this is a good point to agree to disagree.
Shachar
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
2009/1/31 Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz:
I think this is a good point to agree to disagree.
What is, Shachar? You didn't quote anything.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:06:55 +0200
Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
[...]
I could understand the use for reply to list when some people would
get double the emails against their wishes. This, however, is no longer
an issue with most modern mailing list managers.
Well, at the
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:06:55 +0200
Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
[...]
I could understand the use for reply to list when some people would
get double the emails against their wishes. This, however, is no longer
an issue with most modern mailing list
Micha Feigin wrote:
At least the behaviour with claws mail at the moment, reply to list correctly
recognizes linux-il which is good. Previously I've sent private mails instead
of list mails a lot of times because I'm used to using reply to list for all
others and I don't remember to switch.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Here is the situation as I see it:
Reply to all: You respect each individual's preferences regarding how
many copies they want to receive.
Reply: You want to send a private reply, only to the sender (impossible
when the list has
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Here is the situation as I see it:
Reply to all: You respect each individual's preferences regarding how
many copies they want to receive.
Reply: You want to send a private reply, only to the sender
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:55:47PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Here is the situation as I see it:
Reply to all: You respect each individual's preferences regarding how
many copies they want to receive.
Reply: You want
Well, this whole topic is almost as old as Linux-IL, but since we are
at it again... IMHO, the reply-to-all to send to the list paradigm
is totally broken. If I send a message to a discussion mailing list
such as Linux-IL I expect any responses to be sent to the list,
period. If I reply to a
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
The only sane and foolproof method is to have mailman set the Reply-To
field to the list address. This is a fantastically appropriate moment
to do it.
If you want to bring THAT discussion up, then at the very least address
the stated shortcomings of your proposed
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:45:33 +0200
Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
The only sane and foolproof method is to have mailman set the Reply-To
field to the list address. This is a fantastically appropriate moment
to do it.
If you want to bring THAT
Micha Feigin wrote:
That is true, setting reply-to to point to the list is not a good solution. The
proper solution is to set the list header so that modern MUA can use the reply
to list button. Reply-to should reply to sender, reply-to-list should reply to
list.
Don't confuse the
May I suggest that someone open a Web page, which will summarize the
main points (both pro and con) of the discussion so far?
Once such a Web page exists and is available for modifications (such as
being a Wiki), we can start enforcing the netiquette of expecting people
to say something only if
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
They are listed at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html, but the
ones I mostly want answered are these two:
* With reply to set to the list, the failure mode is catastrophic,
while with it not, the
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 07:39:38AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
Somehow GMail seems to be able to do that - When I take part in, or
start, a mailing list thread which is filtered to another folder
(tagged with mailing list tag using a GMail filter) GMail will start
showing this thread *also* in
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:56:01 +0200
Geoffrey S. Mendelson g...@mendelson.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Herouth Maoz wrote:
I prefer it over using reply to all because I can then easily scan
my outbox and detect which messages I sent to the list.
What bugs me is
Hi all,
As Ely wrote before, the list is now running on Mailman. Everyone's
profiles should have been moved. Most of the following are relevant for
any Mailman managed list, but I know things have been heated about these
subjects here in the past, so I'll repeat some of them.
First, as you
Quoting Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz:
Linux-IL is a list with no added reply-to list header. You are kindly
requested to hit reply to all when replying to postings arriving from
the list. Don't worry about people getting two copies. When mailman
notices that your email is in the To or
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Herouth Maoz wrote:
I prefer it over using reply to all because I can then easily scan
my outbox and detect which messages I sent to the list.
What bugs me is people who send emails to 4 or 5 lists and then if I reply
to all, which normally gives a
Herouth Maoz wrote:
I prefer it over using reply to all because I can then easily scan
my outbox and detect which messages I sent to the list.
But I prefer you didn't.
Mails arriving from the list go into the linux-il folder. Emails sent
directly to me are left in my inbox. I read my inbox
2009/1/29 Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz:
Herouth Maoz wrote:
I prefer it over using reply to all because I can then easily scan my
outbox and detect which messages I sent to the list.
But I prefer you didn't.
Mails arriving from the list go into the linux-il folder. Emails sent
31 matches
Mail list logo
