The 'tet' bug doesn't occur in kword (kde), which leads me to the believe that
when i fix culmus in openoffice, there won't be a problem there. (reminder:
gentoo with xorg)
btw, what i know about the 'tet' bug from my mandrake machine is that if you
write with Nachlieli in bold there won't be
Hi,
I have recently upgraded my gentoo system from xfree86 to xorg.
So far, so good :)
Now, I get this weird problem with OpenOffice:
The culmus fonts there all look alike and ugly.
In kword and mozilla everything is just fine.
Any body has any idea what can it be?
(I already tried googling
Noam Meltzer wrote:
Hi,
I have recently upgraded my gentoo system from xfree86 to xorg.
So far, so good :)
Now, I get this weird problem with OpenOffice:
The culmus fonts there all look alike and ugly.
In kword and mozilla everything is just fine.
Any body has any idea what can it be?
(I already
On Monday 22 November 2004 17:34, Baruch Even wrote:
Noam Meltzer wrote:
Hi,
I have recently upgraded my gentoo system from xfree86 to xorg.
So far, so good :)
Now, I get this weird problem with OpenOffice:
The culmus fonts there all look alike and ugly.
In kword and mozilla
How about the tet bug?
I can see it on OpenOffice.org and Qt, but not on GTK applications (not even
Mozilla). I dont see it at all in debian which uses good old XFree86 4.3.
The systems I tested (mandrake, pclinuxos) where both using xorg. People say
that the glyph tet is found in the fonts.
