Re: mandrake su curiousity

2005-05-23 Thread Amit Aronovitch
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:57:40AM +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote: Discovering this raised my curiousity. Since the new login does not have access to the old one's xauth info, this can't be done by the login scripts (I actually grepped them for such stuff). So it must be

Re: mandrake su curiousity

2005-05-22 Thread Amit Aronovitch
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:57:40AM +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote: Discovering this raised my curiousity. Since the new login does not have access to the old one's xauth info, this can't be done by the login scripts (I actually grepped them for such stuff). So it must be

Re: mandrake su curiousity

2005-05-20 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:57:40AM +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote: On a Mandrake machine I've been using, I noticed .xauth{randomtext} files on my home directory (actually I'd noticed them long time ago, but never bothered to take a second look before), containing X authenticators. It seems

mandrake su curiousity

2005-05-19 Thread Amit Aronovitch
On a Mandrake machine I've been using, I noticed .xauth{randomtext} files on my home directory (actually I'd noticed them long time ago, but never bothered to take a second look before), containing X authenticators. It seems that when you use 'su' to switch login, and you have XAUTHORITY

Re: mandrake su curiousity

2005-05-19 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:57:40AM +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote: Doing 'strings /bin/su' confirmed my suspicion - the string XAUTHORITY does appear there. It's probably done by pam. Look around /etc/pam.d. -- Didi = To