Hi. It seems I'm ready for the transition to another distro after a
couple of years unable to upgrade any redhat installation beyond single
cases of success. So I'm either for debian or mandrake, and as I
understand it both have excellent capabilities for upgrading my base
system - but what is
D e b i a n
:-)
Miki Lewinger wrote:
Hi. It seems I'm ready for the transition to another distro after a
couple of years unable to upgrade any redhat installation beyond
single cases of success. So I'm either for debian or mandrake, and as
I understand it both have excellent capabilities for
Gal Gur-Arie wrote:
D e b i a n
:-)
It's nice to see we can count on the Linux-IL population to provide
timely, professional and *reasoned* responses to delicate emotional
questions.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
: Miki Lewinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Israeli Linux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 9:17 AM
Subject: out of the red hat boat!
Hi. It seems I'm ready for the transition to another distro after a
couple of years unable to upgrade any redhat installation beyond single
Shachar,
Yes - my answer wasn't really detailed,
but in this case i think that Debian is a synonym to all he was asking for:
secure patching policy/practice and as I remember your lecture from
last year August Penguin - I am sure you agree with me.
Cheers,
Gal
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Gal
Bom Dia, Miki! Todu bem?
Quoting Ben-Nes Michael, from the post of Thu, 22 Jul:
If you go for Debian use the testing branch ( Sarge ) and not the stable (
woody ), I mistakly went for woody and now I need lots of backports.
a. I'm a bit conservative. for production servers I still stick to
Ira Abramov wrote:
Bom Dia, Miki! Todu bem?
Quoting Ben-Nes Michael, from the post of Thu, 22 Jul:
If you go for Debian use the testing branch ( Sarge ) and not the stable (
woody ), I mistakly went for woody and now I need lots of backports.
Well, you can rectify that pretty easily.
